posted on Sep, 16 2007 @ 07:54 AM
This move for legislation can't be in order to serve the surveillance industry because they have no agenda, and love and trust all Americans,
including Muslims with beards an sunglasses and hats. They also know that real crimes get caught from the evidence of motives and relationships, not
that people randomly commit crimes, and they know Islam is for peace, and often convert with no trouble.
But the government is daddy and mummy. They only watch for our own good anyway, (until we leave home).
Why this emphasis on banks? Robbing banks is a game, a petty crime, I'm sure they don't want to use their shooters: that's only if the bank staff
don't cooperate. They have to carry some threat , or noone would play the game, and then there wouldn't be any bank robbers, and we wouldn't be
able to watch bankrobbing movies.
Yes, you see, he's right, the man who pointed out that the list of hold up venues in public is endless, that is in any commercial area. But then
there's the non-commercial areas, like parks, where people might get mugged, or merely expose themselves , wearing a raincoat -which is pretty
traumatic for some.
I think the question of large-person-disguise must be addressed, nakedness seems a good way to go, in public. Especially because that's illegal too,
and then we can all live and work in prison (naked). BUt even then, there's plastic surgery or 'naked fat man disguise' Best that fat people
can't go naked, best they're rounded up and forced to lose weight immediately. Those who refuse are guilty, caught in the act of planning a
terrorist plot: the evidence is indisputable, who wants to be fat? But what about jolly fat people,? Easy, give them all a personality test, and round
up unhappy fat people. No, that doesn't solve the problem of disguise, I'm losing myself. In any case fat people might pretend to be happy.
All dress codes, and even shapes, present problems: you can be scared of people in fancy dress, true. SO fear rules and ban fancy dress in public, I
say. Then there are insider trading and bank jobs, people stealing nuclear weapons in military uniform. Best to ban all fancy dress everywhere: that
the military should be naked too, although workboots for digging ditches might be OK. Thin people are unsettled, and nervous about something. I bet
most suicide bombers are thin before they strap stuff on.
It's not a question of erosion of liberties, you see. That kind of argument is illogical, when we can suspect everyone and not be content to live in
a world where there is some petty crime, and let the cops catch them the old fashioned way. As Americans, one should have a right to be scared, and
live for ever, knowing that the government will catch everyone BEFORE they commit a crime.
[edit on 16-9-2007 by bolly]