posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 10:26 AM
It's plenty of evidence to show that U.F.O.'s and the beings who fly them exist beyond a reasonable doubt. There's more evidence for these things
than there is for black holes, virtual particles, dark matter or dark energy.
The thing is that ufology runs up against many skeptics pre-existing belief system. You have both direct and circumstantial evidence that supports
ufology. Eyewitness accounts from pilots, police officers, Presidents and more. You have cave painting, paintings, ancient manuscripts, photos and
The Travis Walton case alone is conclusive evidence. There's no other explanation. The skeptics logic is like an eyewitness saying they saw the
murder take place and the skeptic comes in off the street and says, I wasn't there but I know it didn't happen. This is the backwards logic of the
skeptic. It's only allowed to stand in ufology because ufology runs up against pre-existing belief systems.
You can read more about the Walton case here:
You have the ex Governor of Arizona who saw a craft fly over his head that was huge and other's saw it. He's an ex pilot. The skeptic will give
more weight to their opinion thoigh. This backwards logic only applies with ufology and the paranormal. That's because these things challenge a
persons pre-existing belief system.
I can go on and on but you have to just share the evidence and allow the skeptic to live in their own delusions. I was like that at first but the
evidence is overwhelming. To deny ufology, you have to suspend reason and put the weight of your opinion over eyewitness testimony. That's