It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Planet X arrives 2009

page: 1
3
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 12 2007 @ 12:41 PM
link   
I know there are threads on this subject but non point out
to the arrival of Planet X as early as 2009.




Will it ( Armageddon) happen in our lifetime? Yes! When exactly? We believe that clock’s been ticking for several years now. And our best-guess estimate lines up with 2009


www.returnofplanet-x.com...

Less than 2 years away ??


mod edit: changed to external quote tags

Quote Reference (review link)

[edit on 17-9-2007 by UK Wizard]




posted on Sep, 12 2007 @ 02:59 PM
link   
Planet X is around the size of Saturn, that's on an elongated orbit which comes our way every 3,600 to 4,000 years. Is that start of new life cycle?



posted on Sep, 12 2007 @ 03:00 PM
link   
2009? I thought it was arriving 2012? Or is it going to be close enough at 2009 to do some 'damage' to earth, and its peak at 2012? Hmmm



posted on Sep, 12 2007 @ 03:17 PM
link   
Planet X passed by in 2003 causing a pole shift and killing billion of people. Didn't you notice? It's therefore not due back for 3,596 years


Although Sitchin, who invented it, says it's due back in something over 1,000 years time.

Anyone saying otherwise is a charlatan....



posted on Sep, 12 2007 @ 03:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chiiru
2009? I thought it was arriving 2012? Or is it going to be close enough at 2009 to do some 'damage' to earth, and its peak at 2012? Hmmm



Dose make you wonder



posted on Sep, 12 2007 @ 03:36 PM
link   
thats why nasa is working on putting nukes on space ships^^
what do u think they would spend money on this?if they didnt need it



posted on Sep, 12 2007 @ 05:31 PM
link   
I wonder how many nukes you would have to put on a spaceship to blow up a planet the size of Saturn. Maybe only one nuke the size of the moon would do it.

I heard that the most compelling reason to suppose that a large unknown object is floating around out at the edge of the solar system somewhere is that something big is assumed to have swept up the area beyond the Kuiper Belt. This unknown planet should not be called Planet X, it should be called Molly Maid.



posted on Sep, 13 2007 @ 09:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chiiru
2009? I thought it was arriving 2012? Or is it going to be close enough at 2009 to do some 'damage' to earth, and its peak at 2012? Hmmm


I guess the author means its arrival as visible but it really "approaches" our planet on 12/21/2012 and causes a catalysm...



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 04:04 PM
link   
^^^
entering at Pluto...2009







posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 04:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Unisol
thats why nasa is working on putting nukes on space ships^^
what do u think they would spend money on this?if they didnt need it


NASA is working to put nukes in space to be able to control earth. I think the term is "full spectrum dominance"...



posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 04:11 PM
link   
I really really really try to read into this Planet X stuff. I'll sit there and read articles, experts opinions and everything else. I just can't help to feel I am repeating 2002-2003 again.



posted on Sep, 16 2007 @ 12:59 PM
link   
Hi there all,

Read this,

impact.arc.nasa.gov...



posted on Sep, 16 2007 @ 08:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Pazzzzz
Hi there all,

Read this,

impact.arc.nasa.gov...



NASA doesn't want to panic you by telling the truth, anyway NWO is to depopulate why they should inform you?

www.freewebs.com...

[edit on 16-9-2007 by keops]



posted on Sep, 16 2007 @ 10:40 PM
link   
reply to post by keops
 


great videos..I don't believe anything NASA says.



posted on Sep, 16 2007 @ 10:53 PM
link   
NASA

Never A Straight Answer.

I hope this post meet any and all ATS requirements.



posted on Sep, 16 2007 @ 11:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Pazzzzz
Hi there all,

Read this,

impact.arc.nasa.gov...


Just an observation, but if a writer wants people to take their article seriously, they should at least try to spell the title of their article correctly. Hence, Nibiru, not Niburu. The least the author could do is spell correctly the item in question.

If Nibiru is out there, everything I've heard says it'll be visible by 2009. I personally think the likelihood of Nibiru/Planet X/second sun/whatever actually existing is very slim, but anything is possible. If I see a light in the sky towards the end of 2009 that I've never seen before, I'll start learning how to skin animals and dig wells because it's gonna be a long few years of surviving on my own...



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 01:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by resistor
NASA

Never A Straight Answer.

I hope this post meet any and all ATS requirements.


wow you are sharp as a pencil never thought of that! makes sense though!



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 05:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by keops

NASA doesn't want to panic you by telling the truth, anyway NWO is to depopulate why they should inform you?


So Nibiru did pass Earth in 2003 then?

And if the NWO want to depopulate the world, why've they allowed the population to increase 6 fold in the past 100 years?



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 05:47 AM
link   
You know, after seeing a lot of videos about the Mayan culture, im no longer sure that the Apocalypse means total devastation. If you look up what the word really means, you get this:

1. Apocalypse (Abbr. Apoc.) Bible. The Book of Revelation. Any of a number of anonymous Jewish or Christian texts from around the second century B.C. to the second century A.D. containing prophetic or symbolic visions, especially of the imminent destruction of the world and the salvation of the righteous.
2. Great or total devastation; doom: the apocalypse of nuclear war.
3. A prophetic disclosure; a revelation.

The Mayans seem to have believed in number 3 - some kind of enlightment, a revelation of sorts. The religious texts have interpreted the apocalypse as war, but thats not necessarily the correct interpretation.

There are many signs right now that speaks for a increase in consciousness around the world. The Mayans believed there would be a global enlightenment of the world. Alien researchers believe the apocalypse to actually be when human kind enter into the galactic community as a race.

Just yesterday I read a article about Russian scientists making some very interesting discoveries about our DNA. From the article:

"Mike Oram ("experiencer") resides in the United Kingdom. He told me that he was only 4 years old when he told his mother that there was no such thing as death. His mother disagreed, but Mike said ‘the Universe goes on for eternity and it’s not true that we no longer play a part in the Universe. We come back.’ ‘I was too young to know the word reincarnation’, he said. ‘I then shocked her by saying “You are not my real parents, my parents are in space, and something of incredible importance will happen in this planet and it will affect all levels of consciousness, it will not happen in your life time but it will in mine.” My poor mother never forgot that conversation’ (Mike Oram)."

So while apocalypse could mean disaster, it could also mean enlightenment for the human race. Lets hope for the latter. There may not be a Planet X approaching earth, ready to kill of 90% of the population. It may be something totally different and very positive.



[edit on 17-9-2007 by Copernicus]



posted on Sep, 17 2007 @ 06:01 AM
link   
I have watched documentaries where people asked scientists if there was something "big" coming this way would they tell the population??? And the answer has always been "NO".

Dont expect anyone at Nasa to tell you the truth. They say that by 2009 you will be able to definatly tell its just around the corner...and then it will make its appearance and when people start seeing it in the sky they will freak out- It will be reddish-brown in color (that's planet X) with Niburu at its tail (whatever that means) Maybe a big one and a smaller one?
Anyway, its supposed to wipe out 1/2 the Earth's population, but the other half will survive and things will settle down and Earth will survive.

Dont expect the truth on this one.


Oh, and this is when the poles are supposed to switch.

[edit on 17-9-2007 by dgtempe]



new topics

top topics



 
3
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join