posted on Sep, 15 2007 @ 01:11 PM
Until Mr. Lear answers, allow me: What is so hard about understanding that several different means were used to achieve the effects witnessed?
Explosives of a conventional type were OBVIOUSLY used as seen in many clips, making squibs and blowing sections of the buildings apart into carrying
size pieces, as well as to sever the core columns at the level of the ground.
Directed energy weapons were used for the actual TOTAL PULVERIZATION of the Towers. Dustification can ONLY be seen in cases where instantaneous high
energy is applied, and in no ther scenario. Fire and gravity CANNOT turn concrete into a dust with the consistency of flour.That is a fact and beyond
dispute. So we are left with ONLY a directed high energy weapon as a feasible and LIKELY alternative to the oficial lie.
Sure, several means were used; that was the plan and it worked well. It would NOT have worked at all if the media were not totally corrupted and
beholden to the corporate and political masters who actually pulled the 9-11 events off. If even ONE major media outlet were to devote the time and
with an honest and fair presentation of the known facts, it would be all over for the perps. Americans are not stupid, just lazy and trusting. Once
they knew the facts, the outrage factor would be too much for the perps to be able to deny or suppress.
HUNDREDS of ' inexplicable anomalies ' that are NEVER accounted for by the government.A combination of proven facts that scream out for atention,
yet remain consigned to the box labeled ' conspiracy theory ' and relegated to the trash after being discounted despite the obvious value and truth
of it's substance. We see the results of several types of explosives and demolition materials, such as thermite, thermate, cutting charges, and
possible even more exotic explosives; the lower levels were rocked by a force that rodriguez says evaporated a 50 ton press. Imagine that? A 50 ton
press just GONE!! The entire lower levels blasted apart, with people burned and injured, all BEFORE the plane crash(alleged).
The insane excuse about fuel travelling 100 plus stories down the elevator shafts is stupid; they were designed to eliminate any chance of fire
traveling thru them, and they were staggered and sealed for that express reason. No amount of fuel could have gotten to the lower levels, no fuel was
smelled or seen, and the explosive force was far greater than what a fireball could do. There HAD to be a seperate series of tremendous explosions at
the very lowest levels to seprate the steel supports from the bedrock and make the structure ready for the coming top down evaporation of all water
bearing materials, including concrete and humans.
Steel caught fire and waas smoldering and blazing as it fell in great sections from the outer walls, but PAPER was not affected at all!! Tons of
paper everywhere and all of it pristine, none burning, but steel buring right next to it. Amazing that people cannot see the obvious problems here.If
GRAVITY and FUEL FIRES far above the bottom can account for enough heat to melt steel, why did it not burn paaper? Makes one think, doesn't it?
In any event, imagine for a moment that you are the guy who has to plan the destruction of the Towers for the Cheney/PNAC/Black shadow govt. crowd.
You have to come up with a scenario that accomplished the following: The complete and total destruction of ALL of the WTC complex and NO OTHERS. The
' pan ' that the comples sits in MUST not be disturbed due to a massive loss of revenue by the perps and their pals in the financial games. It has
to be LOCALIZED. Then, it must appear to be thr result of the ' airplane ' crahses that were to be the apparent cause of the ' collapses '. Fire
was also a factor, but it proved to be a problem for them as the tapes of Chief Palmer telling us that the fires were small and easily controllable,
ONE FLOOR below where the supposed ' INFERNO ' was melting steel and about to cause the total collapse desired.
That is why that building was the first to fall, and was the last hit by a plane and the least damaged; the illusion of a hot fire was about to be
totally betrayed and so they had to blow that Tower first to stop any further talk about the fires going out soon. They HAD to have the lies of a very
hot fire to support the steel weakening as a cause of ' universal collapse '. If the fires were out and the building was standing strong, as it
showed throughout the entire event, then the jig would be up when they turned the Towers into dust. They HAD to maintain the image of fire until the
beam weapon was used, and they were forced to act ahead of schedule by the unanticipated arrival of the firemen one floor below the collapse zone.
They hate it when a plan goes awray, because it leads to more questions. Questions like " Why did the last Tower to be hit fall first, especially
when it had far less core damage.?". Then they have to either ignore the questions, as the 9-11 Commsission did, or try and make bold assertions of
facts that are not in eveidence. They then are forced to say " Gee, the fires were so hot that the steel weakened just the same as the other Tower
and once they started to go, it all just fell". That then is repeated all over the media and then forgotten about.
The fact that it is all lies and unproven and disproven means nothing; the people are alseep. Those of us who go beyond the norm and actually
research and read