It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by johnlear
No, there couldn't have been any wing damage because there were no planes. No planes crashing into the WTC. There were no Boeing 767's flying into or crashing into the World Trade Center towers. There were no people in those planes that didn't crash into the WTC. It was an illusion.
What people were seeing were holographs, the technology of which are about 30 to 50 years ahead of where people think it is.
Originally posted by tyranny22
Probably banished to the land of heterics along with the thoughts that the earth is round and the universe does not revolve around earth.
Originally posted by ModisOperandi
Here Here! and cheers Josephus Maximus! This thread has been started by fringe idiots! They should only serve as speed bumps on the road to exposing the truth. Let us dismiss them and move on.
Originally posted by josephus maximus
reply to post by kleverone
i would reply with a condensending attitude but i would be struck down by you
...i humbly bow to your superior worthiness sir.
Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi
There'd be no point in a missile. A missile would do about the same damage as an aircraft that size.
My question if John is still on concerns the closeup of the plane which I apparently haven't seen before. Are they flying with their landing gear down?
I can make out what appears to be the doors on the bottom of the fuselage. Would they do that to cause drag and how does that affect manueverability.