reply to post by azchuck
Hi aschuck and mike,
I agree that the probable plan was to steal all 6 and that the 5 vs. 6 discrepancy is indication that they might have succeeded in stealing one before
the authorities, that weren’t in on it, got wind and leaked it.
They only need one for false flag event, what would they do with six? Well, blackmail comes to mind. Put one in six major capital cites and....(use
your imagination) If Cheney's (or his masters) goal is to rule the world could that be an effective way to go about it? I don't know - let debate it
here.
____
On another note: (related to my post on your site) The DNDO (Domestic Nuclear Detection Office) has been charged with developing technology and
databases for nuclear attribution, the hoped for ability to attribute nuclear explosions, after the fact, to source nations. This technology does not
exist yet. The DNDO, which was established in April 2005 within the Department of Homeland Security, is charged, ostensibly, with developing the means
to do this, or the apparent means to do this.
Joe Lieberman may have unknowingly helped us by pointing out that the DNDO was “stovepiped” into the DHS. I think it is possible that the DNDO was
set up by the White House for the sole purpose of attributing a false flag nuclear event to Korean sources, delivered through Syria with Iran’s
support. Sound familiar? I’m sure you’ve already heard those allegations leveled. They may have learned that allegations aren’t sufficient
after the lies that got us into Iraq. The leak may have stopped them from using one of the nukes to further implicate Syria, Korea and Iran. I can’t
figure out a plausible way they could have done this but I’ll keep thinking. What’s your take?
Here is a link to Lieberman’s letter of complaint to Michael Chertoff:
www.fas.org...
Here's another interesting link and quote:
204.71.60.36...
"The American Association for the Advancement of Science is in the very early stages of a study on nuclear forensics, and
the Homeland Security
Department has plans for a White House exercise exploring forensic capabilities after a domestic nuclear explosion.
President George W. Bush drew a clear line for North Korean leadership. The rogue regime had already demonstrated at least a limited nuclear
capability, and Bush warned that a nuclear transfer to a terrorist group would spur repercussions.
Such a transfer would be “considered a grave threat to the United States, and we would hold North Korea fully accountable for the consequence of
such action,” he said.
Determining the North Korean provenance of any nuclear material could come through intelligence gathering or, if material
was actually intercepted or used, through nuclear forensics.
[edit on 29-9-2007 by doubleded]
[edit on 29-9-2007 by doubleded]
[edit on 29-9-2007 by doubleded]
[edit on 29-9-2007 by doubleded]