AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Breaking Alternative News discussion forum.  (rss)


Sources Confirm Israeli Air Strikes on Syria!




Topic started on 11-9-2007 @ 11:44 AM by Rockpuck


Sources Confirm Israeli Air Strikes on Syria!


www.cnn.com

Israeli aircraft carried out an airstrike inside Syria last week, possibly targeting weapons that were destined for Hezbollah militants, according to sources in the region and in the United States.

Syria reported that its aircraft fired on Israeli "enemy aircraft" that flew into northern Syria early Thursday. The Israel Defense Forces had no comment on the report, and have refused to comment further on the new revelations.
(visit the link for the full news article)



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Breaking Alternative News topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 11-9-2007 @ 11:44 AM by Rockpuck


Well, it was confirmed that Syria did shoot at a plane, and that Israel actually dropped bombs..

www.cnn.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-9-2007 @ 11:48 AM by Rockpuck


Well there was speculation on the report, however the official story is out that yes, Israeli aircraft bombed a target in Syria. Another interesting fact is that Israeli ground forces may have directed the attack.

But the sources told CNN the military operation, which happened Wednesday into Thursday, may have also involved Israeli ground forces who directed the airstrike which "left a big hole in the desert" in Syria.



"Left a big hole in the desert"



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-9-2007 @ 11:48 AM by Xfile


Isnt it odd that in this time of instant information that it took days to confirm this?Any idea what the target was?



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 11-9-2007 @ 11:50 AM by Rockpuck


reply to post by Xfile



Apparently it is unclear, however speculation is that the bombs where targeting weapon movement inside Syria that was to be delivered to Lebanon. Not sure how the Israelis knew this, or if thats a cover story though.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-9-2007 @ 12:52 PM by Dolomite


This is CRAZY!

The Syrians can't be taking this lightly. I thought the Israeli's would just deny it and play it off as no big deal and then this thing would be swept under the rug. Not the case.

Has there been any response form Syria or Iran that condemns this as an act of war?

Do they think the ground forces that may have directed the strike were in Syria?

This is NO GOOD.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-9-2007 @ 12:56 PM by Fuggle


Yeah, it's crazy.

No wonder a USAF B52's been outfitted with nuclear cruise missiles.

Fug



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-9-2007 @ 01:01 PM by esdad71


I read that it was an IAF bombing with ground support to stop an arms shipment from Iran. Evidently the US has commented that it supported the action. So what we have here is a proxy war that is now expanding into Eastern Syria.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-9-2007 @ 01:04 PM by bodrul


here is a question
what would of happend if Syria shot the birds out the sky?

1. out cry from Israel
2. israel starting full military action because syria didnt let them walk over them.
3.?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-9-2007 @ 01:16 PM by Rockpuck


Originally posted by bodrul
here is a question
what would of happend if Syria shot the birds out the sky?

1. out cry from Israel
2. israel starting full military action because syria didnt let them walk over them.
3.?


Good question.. especially if the pilot was captured. It would have turned into an international incident, Syrian and Israeli tempers would flare and eventually Syria would have been blamed for supporting terrorism thus Israel's actions would have been supported.

But then again on the other side, does Israel have a right to stop arms at its source before it reaches the front lines of a war its fighting? Of course, all hypothetical.

[edit on 9/11/2007 by Rockpuck]



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 11-9-2007 @ 01:17 PM by Major Discrepancy


The Major is pleased. It's good to see the Israelis go back to their tactics of getting the job done instead of trying to acquiesce to the World's opinion of how to conduct military operations. Maybe some good will come from that ridiculous quagmire that they were engaged in in Southern Lebanon. Anyone who thinks that Israel couldn't have wiped Hizbollah from the map doesn't realize the potential force projection the IDF is capable of. There's a reason none of the Arab nations take a direct shot at Israel and it has nothing to do with the Major's pride and joy, the U.S. armed forces.

Now, if the Major could only persuade the powers that be within Congress and the Executive Branch that a decisive and overwhelming approach with no regard for what some pencil neck journalist might write as a Monday Morning Quarterback then we might be able to get our fine men and women in uniform home; vice the extended bivouac they are currently on.

The Major does not approve of low intensity warfare or U.N. sanctioned police actions, it's time to kick ass. If a day like today isn't a good enough reminder, then there's no hope for you recruit.

Dismissed



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-9-2007 @ 01:18 PM by Rockpuck


reply to post by Major Discrepancy




The Major does not approve of low intensity warfare or U.N. sanctioned police actions, it's time to kick ass.

I am a firm believer that if we actually wanted to WIN the war we are fighting we would have to stop waging this defensive reactionary approach to an offensive war.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-9-2007 @ 01:29 PM by Major Discrepancy


reply to post by Rockpuck



The Major sees potential in you son, olive drab a good color for you? The Major has been trying to convince all the lily livered legislators, and media types that it really is about winning. Every time the Major sees some self loathing poor excuse for a human being lamenting some minor event in Iraq on network TV the Major just wants to take his .45 and draw a bead on his 13" B&W and send it to vacuum tube heaven. Where were you when Dresden was being fire bombed you self righteous jerk? It's war. It's meant to be unpleasant, that's the historical consensus. And the sooner we start making it unpleasant the sooner it will be over.

Dismissed.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-9-2007 @ 04:41 PM by Dolomite


Dolomite is perplexed why the Major must refer to himself in the 3rd person. (just kidding)

Darn fine point there Major. But did you ever consider that we are losing the war in Iraq on purpose?

What about the fact that it is easier to control the resources and government of a country that is in chaos, then to try and control a sovereign entity?

I think this is intentional. Just my take.



   copyright & usage 

























































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.008 seconds
Page processed in 0.070 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.