It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

WTC lease holder admits WTC7 was intentionally demolished !

page: 9
0
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 04:23 PM
link   


The question you then should be asking yourself is how could the building be rigged for implosion in a couple of hours or if it was rigged beforehand, how was it done with no one knowing?

Exactly.What's the problem? That happens to be one of many questions.




posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 04:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Istvan
I will alwasy remain at the WTC UFO theory, and I feel, that it is well backed up at my point of view.
I disagree with the facts/documents, whatever, that the government took any role in the 911 events, but I do believe, that they are hiding so many things about these events, that the population has the right to see.

That's insane. Your degarding questions based HERE IN REALITY for your alien bird theory. Sorry, but that's ridiculous.

[edit on 18-7-2004 by roxdog]



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 04:28 PM
link   
You think that, Roxdog you know, that it is real, you are just unable to believe in what you see.



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 04:35 PM
link   
There are many questions, whether the steel beams were stressed by the intense heat, or not. Several tests using burning jet fuel, were made on the remaining WTC steel elements, and they were found to withstand the heat without distortion, under high pressure load. So, theoritically the beams bent and caused the collapse, but the tests did not prove that. The outer box columns, which were designed to support some weight if the inner core fails, also withstood the tests. Now this collapse still remains mystery, as the impact did not fatally injure the buildings, because if so, they were supposed to fall immediately.



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 04:37 PM
link   
Sorry I don't believe in alien birds. What is your basis for this ridiculousness.



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 04:42 PM
link   
What is your basis on your opinion? I showed you many interesting things about the WTC UFO, but you did not take the time to take a look. Well, that is your problem, but never mind... let's say, the government is behind the attacks, just to believe in your wonderful opinion, which has no backup at all.



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 04:51 PM
link   
You aren't making any sense. There are about 600 smoking guns, ie FACTS that contradict the official story. Your line of thinking is based on birds flying through a camera frame as proof of Aliens (disgiused as birds) fascilitating 9/11. I looked at the ridiculous webites you posted and it takes no time at all to conclude they are a joke.



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 04:59 PM
link   
The official story is the official lie. There were 19 hijackers on board those planes, but they were unable to fly them into the buildings, as they had no skill to do that. The help of the aliens was needed to make the attack just too perfect.

You know, that this is all real, just cannot believe it yet. If you look into all this a bit deeper, you will see how real it is...



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 05:20 PM
link   
If you made any sense at all I might "look into it" (as if there is anything to look into). Feel free to post any info that makes your alien bird theory look like anything but a joke.



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 05:32 PM
link   
Those websites and links all serve the very proof that alien activity and cooperation took place at the terrorist attacks.

There is no need to argue with you, I can feel deeply that you are aware of what you saw, and what you saw has nothing to do with birds.

You just have to acknowledge to yourself, that what you have seen is alien activity using extremely high tecnology.



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 05:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by Istvan
Those websites and links all serve the very proof that alien activity and cooperation took place at the terrorist attacks.

There is no need to argue with you, I can feel deeply that you are aware of what you saw, and what you saw has nothing to do with birds.

You just have to acknowledge to yourself, that what you have seen is alien activity using extremely high tecnology.


There's an old saying.. something along the lines of DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ

So from what I gather from your very laughable "proof" is that these planes were "carried" by UFO's? And the slight lense flare caught when the second plane hit and the bird flying a few hunderd yards away from a camera is "solid proof" ?

I've seen more solid proof in my bowels after accidentally drinking a bottle of Mallox at the age of 11



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 05:56 PM
link   
Come on man, YOU KNOW that aliens were behind 9/11. The aliens that have taken over your body just won't allow you to admit it.



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 06:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by nyarlathotep
I agree with you Dakota, that is why I used the photo you showed. I guess all of the employess just went over and around all of that wiring while they were still working there. Better yet, the building was built with the explosives in place because they knew that they would have to bring it down at a later date.

Every demolition company in the world does it the same way. The inside of the building is gutted and wires are all over the place and it takes quite a bit of time before the building is ready for implosion.

This thread is getting pretty old, the naysayers have one so-called "documentary" that is pretty weak to lean on, but that is what they are doing.

This thread is ABOUT that 'one so-called' "documentary" that you evidently still havent seen or heard.
All you have to refute that 'one so-called PBS documentary' is Banshee saying her daddy says it means remove the firefighters.


Controlled demolitions take a lot of time to set up and the inside of the building is basically destroyed beforehand. I can't figure out why that is so hard for these people to understand.


You really have no basis whatsoever for your contentions.
I would suggest that you do much more research before you start saying things like "I can't figure out why that is so hard for these people to understand."
Did you see this link about halfway down the first page of this thread?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Read through that for some thought provoking ideas.
Otherwise Im thinking perhaps I should put you on the ignore list, right there with your buddy the alien bird guy.



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 06:15 PM
link   
Plane carried by UFO? More like : UFO carried by each plane... if you took close look at those pics and videos.

That orange light can also be seen at the first impact video. Higher resolution video of the Naudent Bros video shows the first plane carrying that object into the building.

Sorry, this was an alien attack, and has nothing to do with the gov., or those nineteen fools, who were obeying higher commands. BinLaden was also just a statue, nothing else. This is the case, you gotta know.

Anyway, the most interesting thing is the spire turning into dust, which is one of the most spectacular part of the event. How does steel turn into dust? Oh, yes... a secret weapon used by the government...



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 06:17 PM
link   
Antimyth, I grow so tired of your bantor. As I have said before, you should make a habit of reading an entire thread before you start typing. Had you read the entire thread, you would see that I did watch the mockumentary.

I have done hours of research on this, again you go typing before you think. Again if you had read the entire thread you would have seen that reason why I take Banshee's word is because her father was an f'n firefighter!

As for threatening to put me on your ignore list, that is a typical remark of someone who is the equivalent of a child throwing themselves on the floor when they don't get their way. I would be honored to be on your ignore list. It just means I got to you and you can't handle it.

I think someone needs a hug and some hot cocoa.

Edit: I guess I have to re-type things for you Antimyth because you refuse to read the entire thread. PBS aired the documentary, they didn't make it, so please don't call it the PBS documentary because it isn't, oh wait I'm probably on your ignore list so it doesn't ereally matter. The ignore list is for babies, . And threatening to put someone on the ignore list is the kid who threatens to take his toys and leave when he doesn't get his way. WAAAAHHH


[edit on 7-18-2004 by nyarlathotep]



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 06:21 PM
link   
Mockumentary? You really think that's an accurate statement?



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 06:23 PM
link   


Sorry, this was an alien attack, and has nothing to do with the gov., or those nineteen fools, who were obeying higher commands. BinLaden was also just a statue, nothing else. This is the case, you gotta know.

You need help...



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 06:23 PM
link   
Antimyth:

Nobody has ever put me to ignore list, so I am waiting for you to do so... I want to know, what it feels like. In exchange, I will also put you on my ignore list, now that's a great deal.



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 06:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by nyarlathotep
............. if you had read the entire thread you would have seen that reason why I take Banshee's word is because her father was an f'n firefighter!


So we have that clarified, you believe something because somebodys dad says so, and more than that, because somebody SAYS that their dad says this.....Yet you call a PBS documentary a mockumentary?

Talk about third grade logic.



posted on Jul, 18 2004 @ 06:27 PM
link   
Mockumentary = fake documentary, that you believe in. At least I believe in the videos I see, not in the bull, that some bigguys write to turn your head around.

I can make some documentary for you, that you will believe in, and you will worship its author for writing the right thing...



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join