It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Antimyth
Evidently you are not aware of how the world works.
Originally posted by Antimyth
Motive? ummmm, geee, could it possibly be the untold BILLIONS awarded in military/industrial contracts, at taxpayer expense?? Or maybe it was the opportunity to 'expand the empire' and rape another nation of its natural resources?
Why would they have to bring the buildings down with a controlled demolition?
Originally posted by roxdog
Good retort by the way. But can you not think of at least a few reasons why the towers had to fall? I try not to draw any conclusions on this. I try to dissolve my emotions and look at the facts and I can at least think of a few reasons the towers neede to come down. THAT's what caused a vast majority of the deaths and it also concealed the evidence, gave reason to take down building 7 etc...
Originally posted by Antimyth
Rox, save your fingers.
This guy is either young, stupid, or maybe he is an agent.
No matter what the case may be his reasoning skill is impaired.
I have yet to read any intelligent post by him and so i will now place him on ignore.
Originally posted by nyarlathotep
Originally posted by Antimyth
Evidently you are not aware of how the world works.
[sarcasm]Oh, I see the way the World works is to fly planes into buildings so we can go to war with Iraq and these companies could get contracts to rebuild Iraq. Thanks, I wasn't sure how the Worlds works, thanks for enlightening me with no proof whatsoever[/sarcasm]
Originally posted by Antimyth
Problem-Reaction-Solution
You fool people into doing what YOU want them to do, not what THEY want to do.
(its how Tom Sawyer got people to paint the fence)
Look it up, its an old trick.
Chew on that one for a while poser, quoting rage while toting the party line.
OK, now that makes some sense, I'll give you that. I guess just flying the planes into the building weren't enough. There would have to be casualties to emotionally trigger the want to go to war. What do you mean gave reason the take down 7, there were no casualties from that were there? Also, conceal what evidence. The buildings falling would have destroyed any evidence if they were brought down intentionally.
Chew on that one for a while poser, quoting rage while toting the party line.
Originally posted by Antimyth
Chew on that one for a while poser, quoting rage while toting the party line.
Originally posted by Istvan
... what were those fanatic guys thinking at the moment of the crash?
Firehouse: Other people tell me that there were a lot of firefighters in the street who were visible, and they put out traffic cones to mark them off?
Hayden: Yeah. There was enough there and we were marking off. There were a lot of damaged apparatus there that were covered. We tried to get searches in those areas. By now, this is going on into the afternoon, and we were concerned about additional collapse, not only of the Marriott, because there was a good portion of the Marriott still standing, but also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o�clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o�clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.
Originally posted by Istvan
Oh ,come on!... That is all nonsense! Rubbish! The government is just not capable for all this...
I believe, that there wew fake phone calls, to make the attack look more brutal, but it is yet i,possible to set up such attack, and get away with it.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Antimyth, I don't see much contradiction there.
Yes, I think they meant "pull" in the sense that they were no lobger going to fight the fire.
Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?
Hayden: No, not right away, and that�s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn�t make any attempt to fight it.
It was a heavy body of fire in there and then WE DIDN'T MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO FIGHT IT