> it gets a little tiresome trying to instill an understanding of the basic
> principles of science and engineering into those who wish to remain
> willfully ignorant of those principles.
It amazes me how some people rather than providing constructive information jump to the conclusion that someone is willfully ignorant because they
come into a forum to detail what they understand of an incident in hopes of getting feedback and a to make more informed decisions, and then somebody
jumps on them for being willfully ignorant.
Let's break down the definition of willfully ignorant:
a) Willful - to do so deliberately and obstinately
b) Ignorant - undeducated
Now, if you will excuse me, you don't know me and you cannot judge a person simply because I come in here posting what I THINK. Nowhere in the post
you quoted did I state that I had the definitive answers. In fact you will reread "does not seem to suggest" and "it is quite conceivable". And
rather than correcting my misunderstanding, you treat this like somebody who is willfully ignorant? And then state that my reply is silly because I
took the time to come in here and participate and gain further knowledge.
At least one thing is certain: You would definitely not make a very good instructor of science and engineering with a patronizing attitude like you
have. All you even had to do was post the link to the article and say "Here is the evidence you are seeking." But instead you flaunt yourself.
--Randall


BUSH is the conspirators in all of this...isnt that what most of you are implying??? GET OVER
IT ALREADY, blame the terrorists for what happened!
)