posted on Jan, 20 2004 @ 03:40 AM
The lease holder of the WTC7 building admits it has been intentionally demolished. I wonder why they had explosives in place coincidentally on 9-11?
"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire,
and I said, We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the
THIS SHOWS FEMA LIED IN THE REPORT. WHY WOULD THEY LIE IF THEY HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE?
I've said it before, I'll say it again
The smoking gun pointing the governments involvement into 9-11 lies in WTC7. We must build around the destruction of wtc7, because it is the most
concrete evidence we have.
A couple questions
How long is the process to equip the building with explosives?
I'm assuming it would take more than a day, keeping in mind that you have to call professionals, order the equipment etc.…..plus it was 9-11. There
was pure mayhem in the city.
If they have nothing to hide, why did FEMA lie when they released their report on the collapse of WTC7?
[edit on 18-7-2004 by John bull 1]