very interesting space anomalies here, I expect there is a rational explaination beside little green men (or big green men for that matter) but very interesting none the less, good thread

Maybe they use the rings to tarn themselves up to the point where our telescopes are able to clearly detect them...?

How come apparent aliens ships and UFO´s are always blobs and white dots which could be anything.?

Ive not seen a convincing one yet.

@Dane69

Kindly what is the source of the photos?

i also do not buy the over exposure theory, i'm not sure about all the objects would be on the same axis they could be space rocks...

however if the are over exposed floating rocks then you have 3 rocks that are EXACTLY the same size and shape ..

odds of that must be staggering?

Also they are very geometrical which are almost unheard of on natural formations.

[edit on 9/9/07 by Quantum_Squirrel]

Originally posted by Terrapop
@Dane69

Kindly what is the source of the photos?

I've seen it posted on ATS sometime back. I don't remember where. There's an entire thread on that.

Now here's an unidentified object, as NASA has admitted (In the green square), orbiting the rings of Saturn!!


Courtesy: NASA/JPL
Discovery Channel

It's NOT a moon of Saturn. Notice its orbit which remains within the outer ring.

Cheers! There's more where they came from! Keep your eyes peeled!

Originally posted by bicnarok
How come apparent aliens ships and UFO´s are always blobs and white dots which could be anything.?

Ive not seen a convincing one yet.

because if they're too clear they're ruled out as aircraft/models/cgi ect.

There's still no ruleing on the chad drone is there? I'd say those pictures are as clear as they come, the story behind it fits extremely nice.

As well as the Billy Meier photos and encounter, has still yet to be proven false.

It really comes down to whether you believe or not. If your a believer, the tiny blurs, and blobs, and lights in the sky will be UFO's, if your a skeptic, I guess they'll just remain blurs, and blobs and what have you.

Some folks will only believe when a UFO lands on their front lawn. That stance is fine. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

I try to look at each picture/story objectively, but your right, most of them amount to just blurry pictures that could be anything, or obvious CGI fakes. Like the Haiti incident.

But there are a certain dozen or so (maybe a lil more, maybe a lil less, I'm no expert) of cases that are still baffleing; as far as pictures and video goes.

But there are many more eyewitness accounts from credible witnesses that are much more puzzling. But anyone who has worked with a police type agency knows eyewitness account is usually poor at best, especially during out of the norm/stressful situations.

But I find this thread, and topic to be very interesting , along with that video posted on page 3 an interview with Riley Martin who supposedly has been abourd one of the saturn motherships. He goes on to explain why they choose that location. Sure is a good story, but anyone could come up with it, and there are plenty of holes in his story as well. Not to mention the 'supposedly' the guy has drug problems.

But placing Mr. Martin aside. These are still some very interesting pictures, and I hope Mr. Lear can produce a photo or two. That would be very generous of his friend to allow since they are only available to see by purchasing his book.

[edit on 9-9-2007 by Nola213]

Most likely a Reptilian ship, as I understand it most of their ships are cylinder shape.

Nice find

Originally posted by schuyler
Given the size of these so-called objects, doesn't ANYONE say, "Hey, wait a minute here."? It reminds me of telling the small child how God made the Earth. "How did he get it out of his workshop?" asked the child. You have an apparent object or two--maybe (nobody really knows) and a newspaper article in a sensationalistic French 'National Enquirer.' No one has done anything but look at a couple of vague pictures, and suddenly you've populated it with millions of alien beings, invoked the obligatory NASA coverup like the required sex scene in a novel, trotted out unsubstantiated rumors of Japanese UFO pieces with no research whatsoever, and off to the races we go, again. The motto of this site is to Deny Ignorance. Why are you promoting it?

Shuyler, given that it took almost 3 pages for everybody to settle down and start using their common sense I would say there is no room for this kind of talk, lol.

Originally posted by Brad.T1870? There were no flying objects then; at least, not from this world.

You need to check your history books. Man has attempted (and succeeded) flight for the past 2000 years :/
1850 or around there was the first engine powered balloon I believe.

Now, 1870 is a little early for larger things of course... But if where talking say a 20 year error, it makes a whole world of difference.

[edit on 9-9-2007 by merka]