so... is this a number "19" on a Mars rock?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 20-1-2004 @ 12:31 PM by Seapeople
Originally posted by ArchAngel
This is not unprecedented. NASA made the same mistake when they faked the moon landing.

They did not paint over the markings on a rock in this image at location marked R:


FAKED MOON LANDINGS ?

batesmotel.8m.com...


I have a question for you Archy. Why in the heck would nasa need to number rocks in any staged solar system landing? That theory makes me laugh at how hard people reach to find something that isnt there.

NASA COULD DUMP ROCKS OUT IN THE DESERT WITH NO NUMBERS. WHY WOULD THEY HAVE TO HAVE SET PLACEMENT?

That theory is a clear indicator of how hard people work to find fault in themselves. We are people. We made it to mars and the moon. Accept that we are capable creatures. Stop belittleing yourself due to low self esteem.

That theory is not thought out, and the people who believe it arent thinking either.


reply posted on 20-1-2004 @ 12:37 PM by browha
Originally posted by Seapeople
Originally posted by ArchAngel
This is not unprecedented. NASA made the same mistake when they faked the moon landing.

They did not paint over the markings on a rock in this image at location marked R:


FAKED MOON LANDINGS ?

batesmotel.8m.com...


I have a question for you Archy. Why in the heck would nasa need to number rocks in any staged solar system landing? That theory makes me laugh at how hard people reach to find something that isnt there.

NASA COULD DUMP ROCKS OUT IN THE DESERT WITH NO NUMBERS. WHY WOULD THEY HAVE TO HAVE SET PLACEMENT?

That theory is a clear indicator of how hard people work to find fault in themselves. We are people. We made it to mars and the moon. Accept that we are capable creatures. Stop belittleing yourself due to low self esteem.

That theory is not thought out, and the people who believe it arent thinking either.


I agree with the whole 'why the hell are rocks numbered' theory, but i dunno about reaching mars or the moon with manned missions... need to make up my mind about it, have read alot of pro and con arguments.


reply posted on 21-1-2004 @ 01:55 AM by JFetch
Originally posted by WeBDeviL
Hold the phones, folks! I was browsing around the main NASA sight, and I had to match it up just to make sure it wasn't faked (Sorry, S.O., I'm a little skeptic on these things myself) And I randomly clicked on another picture, and IT TOO HAD A 19 ON IT! It is on the right side of the photo, zoom in and you will see it!

marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov...

Weird, huh?

-wD


Looks like the same rock to me, but at a different angle. I think these were added by NASA as maybe a navigational aid, or to mark points of interest. There might be different numbers on other pictures, or they just released these pictures with the numbers on them without realizing people would make a big deal about them.

Of course I mean they added them to the pictures, not the rocks

[Edited on 1-21-2004 by JFetch]



reply posted on 21-1-2004 @ 07:28 AM by mikromarius
Originally posted by ArchAngel
This is not unprecedented. NASA made the same mistake when they faked the moon landing.

They did not paint over the markings on a rock in this image at location marked R:


FAKED MOON LANDINGS ?

batesmotel.8m.com...


From the site:

I tried to find a credible man to get my facts from on this subject, and I found just that. The following information came form Mr. Bill Kaysing, seven years head of technical publications for the Rocketdyne Research Department at the Propulsion Field Laboratory in the Simi Hills, near Kenoga Park, California. During this time as head of technical publications for Rocketdyne, Mr. Kaysing had a Top Secret clearance.

Facts about the Moon

An average days temperature on the moon ranges from 260° F to 280° F, too for film to survive. At those temperatures, film crinkles up into a ball.

About 20 miles about the Earth, there is a radiation belt named the Van Allen belt. No human can get through this belt, If you try than you get hit with 300+ rads of radiation. Unless they are surrounded on each side by 4 feet on lead.

There are millions of micro-metors traveling at speeds up to 6000 MPH, which would tear the ship to pieces.

If you look at the pictures/video of people on the moon, you will never see more than 3 stars.

When the LEM set down on the Lunar surface, it gave out 3000 lb. worth of thrust. This would have created a massive hole underneath the Lunar Module, but in pictures of the Lunar Module, the ground underneath is untouched.


Guess the dragon is about to fall down from the sky.... So they weren't the woman dressed in the Sun standing on the Moon after all. Then they are probably not the Father making the enemies of Jesjuah (the hethen gods whose names we have kept alive, only we call them planets, not stars, luminaries, gods or the army of Heaven) as footstools (About God: Heaven is his throne and the Earth is a footstool before his feet) before his feet either.

Blessings,
Mikromarius
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 10 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 4 days ago with 50 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Current Potential Habitable Worlds - Update February 2012
  Posted 2 days ago with 26 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 14 days ago with 22 member flags
Stunning close view of Mercury
  Posted 3 days ago with 20 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 11 days ago with 19 member flags