It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
John, it just strikes me as odd that, after "learning" things for 65 years (longer than some of us have been alive) that leads you to believe in such wild and outlandish ideas, that you have nothing to share, no facts, nothing to convince the average joe? I mean 65 years, and no evidence?!? This isn't religion, its little green men living on other planets, surely you have some sort of evidence you can share that will stand up to even the slightest bit of scrutiny after 65 YEARS?
Your not coming out of this looking too good, John.
I dont believe any of those ridiculous and unproveable claims, so just to let people know where you stand, which of the above (if any) do you believe. I mean REALLY believe, 100% ?
Thanks
Originally posted by johnlear
Thanks for the post Chorlton. Just because my claims are unproveable doesn't mean they are ridiculous. There is nothing ridiculous about a breathable atmosphere on the moon, nor of cities, forests, rivers, lakes and huge artifacts on the farside. Its just information about which you have not been informed.
Originally posted by Chorlton
So tell us all, Oh bigfatfurry one, do you believe John Lears claims of:
Trees and rivers on the far side of the moon? i don't know. Possible, but low probability unless they are being housed within another construction (greenhouse) or are designed to live in that environment, which would not make them trees at all. But since the farside is so well obscured by the body of the moon, i cannot see it and must therefore rely on what little information is released to me by the government who uses my dollars to get a better look. Perhaps it could all be layed to rest if NASA would release all their video and image files? That seems like a simple solution, and their hesitancy tells me all i need to know: trees and rivers or not, there is something there that i am not meant to see by the "powers that be". That alone tells me that, even if he has specifics incorrect, he is likely barking up a tree in the right forest.
Sufficient breathable air on the moon that breathing gear is not needed? once again possible. I don't know if it is probable, but given our lack of personal accounts there isn't much else to be said, other than eveything the astronauts say seems very fishy, very scripted. The whole "patent shoe leather" descrption of the sky is very, very odd
A 'fusion' reactor in Aristarchus Crater i am a proponent of the Plasma Cosmology view, and therefore believe Aristarchus to be some sort of plasma anomoly if natural, or some unknown plasma technology if artificial. Once again, if NASA would be so kind as to release all the information they have (since they are civillian) we can lay this whole matter to rest right now. It would seem to me that John is providing at least a possible solution to what could be going on there. The governments rely on the old Officer Barbrady tactic of "Nothing to see here, move along" when you ask them to explain why it is glowing bright blue. Do you want to toe that line?
Mines on the moon worked by people from earth of course not. they are mined by machines. humans just use the Heavy Lift Program, on loan from the DoD, to get it back to earth. Zorgon could tell you more than you will likely bother to hear on this subject.
A Secret Space station Have you ever watched "Contact"? There is aline in that move that sums up my thoughts on this: "Why build one for billions of dollars when you can build another secret one for twice the cost?" (ok, so i butchered the wording, but that is the concept presented). There is either a secret space station, or the technology is so far beyond that that a secret space station would be like having a hitching post outside a gas station.
That every planet in our solar system is inhabitted. this is a loaded question. No, i don't agree with John in this assertion. But, then again, i also realize that life is not necessary biological (the buddhist part of my soul, i guess). I cannot speak on what types of "personalities" or exotic lifeforms could be living in the clouds of Jupiter. This is one of those "probability/possibility" questions. I think it is both probable and possible, but like the ant, it could exist on a completely different scale than us and therefore be only marginally interested (if even at all) in interaction with us.
(and thats only a few of his propositions)
I dont believe any of those ridiculous and unproveable claims, so just to let people know where you stand, which of the above (if any) do you believe. I mean REALLY believe, 100% ?
Thanks
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
You can "iggy" me all you want, and spend time with people that will be nicer to you, but fill you full of crap, your choice.
Originally posted by Old Man
But extraordingary claims require extraordinary proof.
Regards,
Stephen.
Originally posted by johnlear
There is nothing ridiculous about a breathable atmosphere on the moon,
Originally posted by denythestatusquo
What if Jupiter is not a gas giant with myriad surface storms as claimed but we are in fact looking at a higher level of existance?
The surreal view of Jupiter is due to the fact you are looking at a reality above our own.
You could crash an atomic bomb the size of a jumbo jet and not hurt one of those Jupiter inhabitants.
Originally posted by Essan
Originally posted by johnlear
There is nothing ridiculous about a breathable atmosphere on the moon,
well actually there is: a dense atmosphere on the Moon would be clearly visible from Earth
Originally posted by zorgon
Top of Himalaya Mountains air is thin yet breathable
Originally posted by Access Denied
Whatever’s “going on” it’s a natural phenomena. Who cares?
(besides planetary scientists and amateur astronomers)
There is no “Secret Space Agency” or Aliens living on Earth or Humans on the Moon or another planets…
AD
admin edit: removed childish name calling and applied a 3 day post ban to the previously banned member who just doesn't seem to get it that ATS is a place of TOPICAL FOCUS not personality focus...
[edit on 9-16-2007 by Springer]
Originally posted by zorgon
Well I would have thought it obvious that WE care... and many in the threads
I guess the obvious just escapes some people, huh?
But hey seems we have reached a milestone here Access Denied finally admits "something" is going on at Aristarchus, he just doesn't care
Thanks for the input and the confirmation
The definition of Lunar Transient Phenomena (L.T.P.) is a short lived phenomenon observed on the Moon. This can consist of red glows, flashes, obscuration, and abnormal albedo and shadow effects. There have been over 2000 reports of L.T.P. going as far back as A.D. 557. We now know for some of the reports of flashes seen on the Moon that these may have been due to meteorite impact flashes. Other L.T.P. reports remain a mystery as to what surface physical processes could create these?
The goals of the L.T.P. sub-section [of ALPO] are as follows:
1) To re-observe lunar features at the same illumination conditions (to within +/-0.5 deg) or illumination and libration conditions (to within +/-1 deg) of the original L.T.P. report. The purpose of this is to determine the normal appearance of these features for comparison with the original report, and help eliminate obvious misinterpretations of surface features that may have occurred in the past.
[snip]
6) To co-operate with Lunar missions as was during the 1994 mission to the Moon by the Clementine spacecraft. The Association of Lunar & Planetary Observers (ALPO) had the opportunity to participate with this mission by conducting ground based observations on specific lunar formations as the spacecraft passed over them.
Clementine was a joint project between the Strategic Defense Initiative Organization and NASA
Originally posted by zorgon
Top of Himalaya Mountains air is thin yet breathable
Now John has also said "breathable for a short time" so maybe we need to start with just how thin an atmosphere can be and still be just breathable...
Should be easy with all the 'space scientists' we have here