It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jamesder
what is the "official position" on the desolate Mars rover images?
Originally posted by jtc1967
A few questions here...
The venus atmosphere is like 461.85 degrees C (861 F ). The question is how did we manage to soft land a probe on the surface. I would think that the parachute would of burned up or melted long before it reached the surface.
it might just be me but something about the official explanation doesn't ring true.
About Mars ... The biggest questions I have about mars is why does nasa insist on coloring the sky red.
The moon : This is Mr . Lear's Forte ....
though there are a few things that I just don't buy about the moon and other things he has stated on this board I can actually buy into.
An atmosphere on the moon , plausible.
Moon bases ... Very possible and even Nasa unintentionally adds to the credibility to that with all of the Moon picture edits and air bushing
The question here is , human of alien bases ?
If lunar knowledge is his forte, I would love to see what you would consider his "piano".
Originally posted by HighDefinitionFilms
Ignore The Facts:
I am what you would consider a halfway point between yourself
and Mr Lear.
I would LOVE to believe what Mr Lear says about the alien population
within the solar system (as well as many of his other theories)
and my GUT does believe them...
I am looking for the same type of answers from Mr Lear...
not as a challenge to him, but rather, the opposite...
I want facts to back up his theories so I can,
with a clear conscience, go out and tell it on the mountain, so to speak.
Here is one good answer from Mr Lear regarding these claims-
it is an answer he gave to basically the same question posed many months ago... (i am surprised he has not restated it yet)...
To the question of WHY no pro or amateur astronomer does not
use a telescope to document the existence of life in the neighborhood...
Mr Lear claims:
Ordinary telescopes are too weak to see the surface details...
and the big boys at observatories and universities are
tightly controlled in term of access/where they are pointed.
Personally, I can't imagine that there is NO rebel astrophysicist
somewhere out there with the right security access swipe card
who has not pointed the glass at Mauna Loa at the sexy neighbor
Venus like Jimmy Stewart did in "Rear Window"...
But hey- what do I know?
I'm so dumb I still think I saw a UFO in New Jersey over Labor Day weekend.
Originally posted by Navieko
But you see, thats the point. Why play ignorant? Your asking for proof, knowing that the evidence we have to present, is not enough to convince you.
...which brings us back to my first post. We're not about to waste time going back and fourth over the same pointless bullsh#t. We know our evidence isn't enough to convince you
You may have all the time in the world to want to have pointless debates/arguments... but we aren't so lucky/unlucky. Just agree to disagree, and thats that.