Counterterrorism Officials Analyzing Islamic Web Post Warning of 'Special Gift', page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 6-9-2007 @ 07:30 PM by Broker
reply to post by Night Watchman



I agree, the gift is the video from Bin Laden. Maybe another offer of truce, that will immediately be turned down.


reply posted on 6-9-2007 @ 10:26 PM by Melbourne_Militia
Just read on Major Ed Dames's remote viewing website that they have located the actual position of where Bin Laden is in North Western Pakistan and in which province and that the US is closely watching his movements, but due to political issues cannot go in to get him.

I dont know how verifiable Ed Dames is, but if true then the gift may be the other way around and we might give ourselves bin laden.

anyone else care to comment on this?

heres the link-
www.learnrv.com...

On a recent national Coast to Coast AM radio show with George Noorey, Major Ed Dames and his team have claimed to locate the stronghold for Osama Bin Laden in the Lakki Marwat District of Pakistan's Northwest Frontier Province. This location is a veritable copy of the terrorist group's former mountain fortress at Tora Bora.

Due to current political relations and agendas regarding the current war in the Middle East, the United States government still has little interest in actually retrieving Bin Laden even though his movements are being closely tracked.

In recent news, it was also suggested that the U.S. government utilized Remote Viewing to locate and capture Saddam Hussein.



reply posted on 6-9-2007 @ 10:50 PM by wenfieldsecret
reply to post by Melbourne_Militia



you may be on to something....before if we were attacked by the border....we could not follow the attackers into pakistan.....and recently...(past couple months)...we have been granted permission to chase them in a little ways.....


reply posted on 6-9-2007 @ 11:49 PM by Sanity Lost
www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2007/040907_cheney_orders.htm

The publication reported that, "The response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of terrorism directed against the United States," meaning that any such attack will immediately be blamed on Iran and any evidence to the contrary will be buried.


This may answer some questions as to how Iran will be blamed for any so called attacks against American interests. The scary part of the story is the plan (as of 01 August 2005) is to use nuclear weapons in addition to the massive air strike.

Help me out here. Am I correct to say that the newest of the bunker buster bombs do contain a small nuclear warhead? If so what are the odds they will be the only nuclear weapons use?


reply posted on 7-9-2007 @ 01:33 AM by Kronik98
Osama bin Laden will release a new video in the coming days ahead of the sixth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks in what would be the first new images of the terror mastermind in nearly three years, al-Qaida's media arm announced Thursday

Source:
Yahoo News

So he's not really dead(allegedly) I am very curious to hear exactly what is released on this tape, and it may give an indication what this "gift" is, if this is not the gift itself



reply posted on 7-9-2007 @ 07:37 PM by EBE154
reply to post by zeroeffect



of course not... i meant the government / elitist groups who are responsible for that!


reply posted on 7-9-2007 @ 09:10 PM by RiotComing
Originally posted by Night Watchman

Right now the only media outlet reporting this seems to be Fox News. That makes me a bit suspicious. I'm sure there will be information forthcoming in the next few hours...if there is any substance to this at all.

That's because the media are tightly controlled by the CIA. Proof is on Page 6 of this document:
www.disclosureproject.org... There's probably a tad bit of confusion among the ranks regarding how to handle the whole boogeyman and fearmongery thing. They are divided over how to handle the false flag process. There are probably many true patriots in there who will risk themselves to stop their cohorts committing insanity. According to Ben Fulford, the Rockefeller and Rothschild bloodlines are following different goals, and then you have the Chinese coming in and threatening to spoil their party. Things are divided in the underground. I suspect the Islamic extremists themselves will be beginning to get a little toey as they await orders from their masters at the top of the pyramid. They'll have to be content with ticking along with the drug-running til they eventually get the green light (blinking with a green "P" for Patsy!!).

I don't claim to have any verifiable proof of this, it's just my assessment of what's going on right now. So many conflicting reports. I believe there's a lot of dissention going on behind the scenes. Maybe a lot of the quagmire stems from the sticky issue of Iran. There's a push to get in there (as per the PNAC) but are the possible consequences deemed too risky? Even for the powers that be? Is there a sector within who have analysed the future via Looking Glass technology (for more information, go to the Project Camelot website and watch the Dan Burisch interview - approximately 33 mins into Part 1) and decided that the risks are too great? It's all food for thought. Just throwing a few "out there" ideas into the mix to offer up other possibilities.

[edit on 7-9-2007 by RiotComing]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 191 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 13 hours ago, 107 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 8 hours ago, 88 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 7 hours ago, 61 replies