posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 05:21 PM
New member here. My name is Joe, and I'm a full time professional scientist (Metrologist). I also have an interesting background in other sciences,
as well as arts. I worked in Aerospace for almost a decade and dealt with the government on a business level for the majority of that time. I was a
Sikorsky aircraft source inspector and a Boeing source inspector, in addition to being a computer geek. Ha ha ha. Anyway, I've been perusing the
boards for a few days now, and being impressed with the amount of logic that is dispayed on these boards more often than not decided to join, not only
as a potentially valuable member but also to challenge some of the things I've read or some of the hearsay that's being spread like wildfire across
the internet. Ha ha ha.
So my first question to everyone on the board is with regards to what I'm considering pure baloney, the posts regarding Planet Serpa. I do beleive
the core of the purposed event(s) is well within the realm of possibility....as well as probability. However, with regards to the posts on Serpa.org,
I'm curious to know why no one has questioned how in the same breath as it is said :
"The Ebens had no comparable item like batteries." it's also said, "The Eben's energy device / regardless of the electrical demand, provided the
proper current and wattage".
Maybe I've missed something or I'm just a green-horn. Ha ha ha. Anyway, my nature tends to question so I'm just throwing it out there as long as
I'm taking the time to introduce myself.
[edit on 5-9-2007 by jbecker]