posted on Sep, 4 2007 @ 01:23 PM
Of course the media is being manipulated by the gov., why do you think the major media outlets received letter with anthrax shortly after 911? They
would have reported on the letters no matter who got them, but the major media outlets were the ones who received them, so why send them directly to
A few facts, the white house staff began taking cipro, the antibiotic for the treatment of anthrax, on 9/11/01
The first wave of letters were sent out 9/18/01, so the white house staff started taking the cipro a full week before the letters were even mailed,
probably three weeks before anyone came down with anthrax.
The anthrax strain used was traced back to a military lab where very few people actually had access.
The two senators who received the letters held key positions to block or stop the patriot act and were opposed to it.
The first victim to die from anthrax was Robert Stevens a photo editor, who got a letter directly addressed to him, for the National Enquirer who
had just chosen a few months before a photo of one of the Bush twins that did not show the young lady at her best. Strange coincidence one might
It is really strange when you look at the list of media outlets that got the letters, ABC, CBS, NBC, a leading New York paper, I think it was The New
York Post and then the National Enquirer. If you were picking the one that did not belong in that list which would it be?
When one looks at all of the people who got the letters directly addressed to them then it is not hard to see an agenda and when one looks at the fact
that the strain came from a military lab then it is not too difficult to figure out that the letters were not sent out by some nut job in a basement
Someone chose these media outlets with a purpose in mind. It's obvious we do not have a free press anymore unless of course you want to know what
Lindsey Lohan is doing these days. If you are expecting any real investigative journalism, don't hold your breath.