posted on Oct, 9 2007 @ 10:46 AM
I've shared many e-mails and spoken with Stan Friedman on several occasions. I've also been reading and researching the topics of his own work for
many, many years.
In all the time I've know him, I've never heard him once utter even the slightest exaggeration, much less an untruth. He seems to me to be one of
the most trustworthy, articulate, and credible UFOlogists among a crowded field of so-called experts, many of whom are un-credentialed, self-anointed
pundits clearly and consistently giving the study and science of UFOlogy a black eye by the media, the public, and the government.
As for Friedman's scholastic achievements, all I can say is that he really added to his dignity when I once referred to him as "Dr. Friedman". He
immediately corrected me, saying that although he is a nuclear physicist, he holds no PhD, and so is just Mr. Friedman, or preferably, just
Nevertheless, he is far more learned and erudite about the subject than a whole slew of others that you may wish to chastise here: Try Billy Meir,
the "prophet" Yahweh, or an incredibly disillusioning array of obvious frauds out there.
I just don't understand why you chose this man to berate of all the other obvious choices out there. Read a few of his books. Write to him. Talk
to him. He's quite approachable and very personable - not to mention that he carries around warehouse full of UFO and conspiracy knowledge in his
We need guys like Stan Friedman. What I'm ashamed for is the OP...