This topic is in the Space Exploration discussion forum.  (rss)


Man Working On The Moon?


<<  1    2    3    4    5  >>



reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 09:48 PM by Gorman91


Probably talking about the 2010 (?) mission to the moon.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 09:50 PM by Sytima


You're reading it out of context. They are saying the dust is dangerous to "man" working on the moon. They won't say "men" because that'd be sexist. Instead, by "man" they mean "the human race".



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 09:51 PM by zorgon



Originally posted by Syntaxstealth
The moon topic has been on here for 3 months straight.
Modz, any possibility we can start a section moon specific?


3 Months??

Hmmm funny though I thought we had that already something called the
John Lear's Moon Pictures thread that is 208 pages and has been going since 13/9/2006
www.abovetopsecret.com...

HEY!!!!!! That meand the anniversary is coming up in a few days!!!

WHOO HOOO I will have to dig up something BIG to celebrate





Originally posted by Sytima
You're reading it out of context. They are saying the dust is dangerous to "man" working on the moon. They won't say "men" because that'd be sexist. Instead, by "man" they mean "the human race".


Yuppers thats got it



Originally posted by uberarcanist
Whatever the case, don't believe ANYTHING Lear will post here. I'm sure plenty of people will back me up on this.


Now that is a really dumb comment...



Sounds like something you would expect in grade school. So what makes YOU any more credible?



[edit on 3-9-2007 by zorgon]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 10:11 PM by StreetCorner Philosopher


www.specintel.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">www.specintel.com...

So I say, give us a piece of this cheese. In the old looney tune cartoons, the moon was made out of cheese!!!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 10:15 PM by Renshin


Um
Are you sure they dont just mean that when people are working on the moon, since its in the range of that, that its a danger?

Seems normal to me.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 10:18 PM by StreetCorner Philosopher


Mr. Lear, I think I recall you saying that this was a scam.

www.direct.ca...

Like I said man, cheese! Whenever Tom and Jerry went to the moon, it was...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 10:35 PM by Maverickhunter


Eh... perhaps we could have continued going to the moon and NASA may have made other missions to go to the moon that were secret, outside of the apollo missions and now we're just beginning to know about it?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 10:49 PM by Ketzer22


reply to post by mantic



adding to what you said... I think that we really did go to the moon, but what the public saw wasn't really what was there, because the astronauts saw bases, and moon structures, and they didn't want the public to see. This video on youtube allegedly shows a video taken by Armstrong from one of the missions. I'm sure this video has already been posted on the site, but i'm only putting it here for reference to what i'm talking about.
www.youtube.com...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 10:53 PM by StreetCorner Philosopher


Why can't everyone actually look at my links. People are still talking about us never going to the moon? We have been there for a long, long time!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 11:06 PM by Misguided Russian


I think that its about people who are sent to explore and collect samples from the moon. Driving a buggy into a giant crater out there cant be good.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 11:07 PM by StreetCorner Philosopher


So you think this guy Resnick is just sitting around for NASA to build their new CEV and Lunar bull###T craft?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 12:28 AM by Areal51


reply to post by Renshin



I agree with you, Renshin. That entire section goes through a list of possible outcomes of the Earth passing through the dust trail of comet C/1911 N1 (Keiss).


With the comet back on its way out, when was the dust ejected that makes up the comet dust trail: During the comet's prior return of around 83 BC, give or take a century, 2000 years ago at the beginning of our year count. The dust has since made one revolution, some particles making a wider orbit than others and returning later. There is a continuous stream of dust particles passing by Earth orbit, but only when the planets steer that dust trail in Earth's path do we see a meteor outburst.

Important because:

* Only known case in our lifetime: crossing of the dust trail of a known long period comet.
* Long-period comets, such as were Hale-Bopp, Hyakutake, and McNaught, tend to sneak up on us. They are a potential impact danger. What can the dust trail tell us about their physical nature?
* Their dust is a danger to satellites in orbit and man working on the Moon.
* Dust stream could contain material from original cosmic-ray produced crust of comet.

Source

If one reads the entire section it even talks about several other comets. The third point also refers most notably to "Their dust is a danger to satellites in orbit and man working on the Moon." It's referring to every comet mentioned on the page. It's not a slip up. It's not some whistle-blower's attempt to get the word out, thus subverting NASA's secrecy. It's just a mention in a short list of possible dangers facing orbiting satellites and Man working on the Moon -- if he were there. It's nothing more than that. It's a statement made in the context of possibility. Context accounts for everything.





[edit on 4-9-2007 by Areal51]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 12:28 AM by sdrawkcab


Just to add a bit of nonsense...maybe they mean "working on the moon" as one would mean; "I'm working on my poject."

One doesn't have to be on the moon to work on it. Maybe the word moon is the name of a project...project moon.

LOL...sounds rediculous...but very possible.

*& no...I didn't read the article*



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 12:55 AM by zorgon



Originally posted by Maverickhunter
Eh... perhaps we could have continued going to the moon and NASA may have made other missions to go to the moon that were secret, outside of the apollo missions and now we're just beginning to know about it?


Before Apollo... during Apollo... and after Apollo...

we have several threads on that

Did you know the Air Force had a project that talked about the Apollo rockets being capable of reaching Mars and Venus?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 01:03 AM by zorgon



Originally posted by StreetCorner Philosopher
Why can't everyone actually look at my links. People are still talking about us never going to the moon? We have been there for a long, long time!


Because everyone thinks your a wacko... I mean people on the moon etc etc what's one to think?



Welcome to the club

If I had a dollar for every link I have provided by those demanding evidence that WASN'T looked at I would be rich



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 01:30 AM by mikesingh



Originally posted by AcesInTheHole

Their dust is a danger to satellites in orbit and man working on the Moon.

What do you think they mean by man working on the moon??



I personally don't think there's a big deal in this. Just semantics. The author was probably making a sweeping statement meaning that the dust from the comet could be a danger to any astronauts if on the Moon at that particular time.

Well, that's just my two bits! But I seriously don't think he meant that the dust is a danger to men presently working on some Moon base!

Or did he mean Aliens on their Moon bases? Now that's more credible!

Cheers!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 01:37 AM by mikesingh



Originally posted by zorgon
If I had a dollar for every link I have provided by those demanding evidence that WASN'T looked at I would be rich


Ron, if I had a dollar for every link you have provided that WAS looked at by me, I would be rich too!!

Cheers for the Man on the Moon...and that darn rabit too!!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 01:41 AM by zorgon


Hey Mike nice to see you back!!

And your probably right in this case... so that's why I am not making a big fuss over it..

BUT it IS a nice find... slip up or semantics it still makes a great quote "for the cause" after all it DOES have a NASA addy

And you know perfectly well that they are mining up there

Have you been to this thread yet?

www.abovetopsecret.com...

BTW I found some fossils on Mars... need your help to track them down... NASA wasn't nice enough to link me to the originals.. drop me a note. I tried to get Bluebird but she's not back yet



[edit on 4-9-2007 by zorgon]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 01:49 AM by zorgon



Originally posted by StreetCorner Philosopher
So you think this guy Resnick is just sitting around for NASA to build their new CEV and Lunar bull###T craft?


That's Dr Resnick to you.. a little respect please and he doesn't build space ships... he ummm "hides" things



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 01:58 AM by mikesingh



Originally posted by zorgon
Have you been to this thread yet?
www.abovetopsecret.com...


Wow! Now how did I miss that? Haven't read through the entire thread though, but will do so now. Thanks!


BTW I found some fossils on Mars... need your help to track them down... NASA wasn't nice enough to link me to the originals.. drop me a note. I tried to get Bluebird but she's not back yet



Bring em' on! Let's see what you've got!

And Bluebird's on vacation. Somewhere in the kuiper belt! And Beth's gone underground. What's with these guys, huh?

Cheers!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3    4    5  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:

































ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, ,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.147 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread