John Lenard Walson: Biggest discovery ever?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 25 times


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 11:40 AM by IgnoreTheFacts
Originally posted by arktkchr
Insane, some of you people are so middle-American hick, it's sickening.... I imagine the govt monitors these forums to see how people could react if there was full disclosure and this is one reason probably why they don't -- mass anger and panic.


Ha, those pesky middle American hicks sure have some common sense, lol. Yeah, the government monitors these forums, lol. To learn about reptiles, how aliens mate, and the hundreds of other foolish topics around here. And you say we're insane, lol?

I don't know if there will be disclosure or not, but I do believe in life beyond, just check Frank Drake equation (Green Banks equation). Since we exist, there's a theory that other life prob exists as well. I think it's like 10k communicating civilizations could be out there.


I agree, as would anyone with common sense.

Originally posted by theinfamousone

He said that this information will be revealed in the next movie "Interstellar II" He also mentions in the email that it's in the editing room now and they have even more footages of more starships than before.


HA. HA, LOL. How convenient for him. Let's not worry about verification, let's hold onto the best stuff for "chapter 2", lol. Starships" He must have much better evidence and pictures than what he is showing in this video.

People, stop giving FOOLS like this your money and attention. There is NOTHING here. They are nothing but snake oil salesmen. Go ahead, give them you money because you want to believe, the rest of us with a modicum of common sense will wait until their OUTLANDISH claims can be verified IN THE LEAST before jumping on board with you.


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 12:18 PM by paul76
reply to post by IgnoreTheFacts



I wouldn't put it past the Governments to make up an absurd theory regarding the footage, they've done it in the past and got away with it to very high degree. LOl your are correct, nobody should trust or believe what our administrations are saying at present, but yet again, they get away with it, It just simply comes down to the fact that the larger populace can't be bothered or aren't interested due to the rigors of normal life.


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 01:06 PM by AZMac
After reading this thread I figure I'd ask a couple questions that most people have, in other words a summary of unanswered questions. I think these need to be answered before this video/images are even close to credible:

1. All are pretty blurry. Is it that you cannot focus that far, or are you deliberately keeping the objects not focused.

2. What is the exact set-up of the telescope and CCD camera? Can you track these objects in real time video?

3. Are there any people who can corraberate your claims? Witnesses who where there while you shot the video/images?

4. Have you gone to the media with this information? More than a youtube positing?

5. Aside from making money on an upcoming movie, what is your motivation for letting people know this information? Why should we care? If it's so important that we know, why haven't the other questions been answered?


I really think these questions need to be answered before I can take this video/images seriously. You know, back in the early 90's we didn't have advanced CGI. Now, having CGI technology makes it 100000000 times harder to believe anything you see unless you actually see it yourself. I've watched many of the youtube posts and although they are entertaining, you never really know what is real or not without the witnesses and the data to back things up. And that data has to be verified through independent sources, not governmental agencies (you can't trust them).

For example if 5 people on here all agreed on supposed ufo data, I would be much more apt to believing it that say something that was verified by NASA. All in all, I do believe we are being visited...that's a given, but there are times when I just need a little more before I can accept what I am seeing.


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 01:07 PM by MetisElara
Originally posted by WASTYT

This thing filmed in Israel immediately came to mind when I saw the pics and vids in this thread...


www.youtube.com...


Wow! I was thinking about this footage just yesterday, and had no idea where to begin to find it again. Thanks for posting it. Very compelling. One of the best out there. Easily.


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 01:15 PM by Areal51
reply to post by dodgygeeza



The first question you should ask is, "What do I know about one John Lenard Walson?" Do you even know the subject of his footage? No one seems to know what it is that Walson has. What we do know is that he has something. He has a filming/photography technique that he has yet to share with those interested in knowing. He has footage of something. Something that many of us are not in a position to fully vet. Yet you have taken it to the level of worldwide human importance. It is you who do not understand charity. Walson has already publicly made available many, many, photographs of his work, and he has not charged admission to see them!

You speak of charity but you fail to recognize it. You have berated Walson because of your own selfish desires. You are the one who has created a standard that he must rise to the level of. You are not exactly coming across in the benevolent vein that you wish you were.


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 01:32 PM by sherpa
Originally posted by Exemplar
Just thought this might have some relevance here.
"Lucky" camera takes clearest pictures of space (from the ground!)

BBC Mirror of the story

Coincidence? No idea...just food for thought.

[edit on 4-9-2007 by Exemplar]


Hi Ex,

I am afraid this just doesn't compare, they are talking about a professional observatory here, a 200 inch reflector is massive and you certainly could not pop into a shop and buy one.

Regarding these images I have an inkling they are possible, I looked up to the sky last night using just a pair if 10x50 binoculars I was looking at what I thought were stars only they had a more yellow tint to them and they seemed to refract light more.

I have just recently bought a Dobsonian 16" telescope and hope to get a better look tonight, I believe the only way to prove these things to yourself is to do it yourself.


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 01:38 PM by Chorlton
reply to post by sherpa


Have youhad much experience with a Dobsonian?
Just setting it up corretly is an art in itself


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 01:53 PM by nixie_nox
Originally posted by neonine
amazing photo and video indeed. The only thing that strikes me as odd is he never really tells you how he's getting these images. A very vague description at best, correct me if im wrong.

heh you know if it is true it makes me feel like earth is and intergalactic truman show


Lets say that maybe his device is for real. I could see him hiding it until he gets a paton on it(which can be a lengthy and expensive ordeal) before he reveals it so no one else can steal it and make money off of it.

If I invented something that could potentially be bought for a lot of money, I wouldn't show anyone either.

Edited to add: I just saw the InfamousOnes post about him getting a paton.

Also, why do people think that if someone makes a great discovery, it isn't valid unless they do it for free?
Surgeons don't work for free.
Teachers don't work for free.
Police don't work for free.
Fireman don't work for free.
Yet, it doesn't make their crafts any less influential, and it doesn't mean they don't care about what they are doing. Because they still have to pay the bills. They are just getting paid to do what they love. Quite frankly, if a teacher is great at what they are doing, I want them to get paid well so they keep coming back.
I don't know too many scientists who work for free. I would want to make money off of it. My bills are coming in whether I do charity work or not.
And you don't know how much of his own money was spent in the process.

[edit on 4-9-2007 by nixie_nox]


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 01:57 PM by sherpa
reply to post by Chorlton




Only aquired the scope in the last few days and had to do a lot of homework to get to this point, it is supposedly laser collimated at the factory but just useing the Mk 1 eyeball I coud see it was out.

I have collimated it better with just a peephole mask centerd in the focuser and am awaiting delivery of a laser collimator so it will have to do until then.

I am trying to track down a equatorial mount that will work with this Dob but have not had a reply from my email as yet.

CCD is not a problem but I have not odered it yet.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 7 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 17 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 1 days ago with 27 member flags