posted on Sep, 3 2007 @ 02:29 AM
I would HATE, to see what a modern day nuclear warhead could do.
Hiroshima was bad enough, and that was a mouse'fart compared to todays bombs.
The west is the biggest wimp in the business.
We only strike nations whom DONT have nuclear bombs.
We're FORCING people, who want to have a sovereign nation to build the bomb, because thats the only way the west wont RAPE and MANIPULATE their
If anyones going to use a nuclear weapon, there's going to be a BIG risk that other nations will follow, because in my mind, he whom breaks the
nuclear taboo opens the door for the world to justify it.
No situation, that man can comprehend requires a nuclear retaliation.
Nadda, So anyone whom uses it, does so recklessly, out of order and as a crime against humanity.
As for defense?... lets look at past records.
Did nuclear weapons stop Nkorea from invading?
Did nuclear weapons stop the vietnam war?
Did nuclear weapons stop terrorists from attacking various times?
Nuclear weapons only work when 'nations' are involved in occupying and invading, supposing the nations your invading or occupying has them.
And that mentality went out of the 'civilised-world' back in the 40's...
Unless of course your doing it for corporate gain and making excuses then its tolerated, especially when YOU have them, and other nations dont.
I believe their should be 100 nuclear weapons.
Various designs, from various countries.
There should be one group, akin to the league of nations, united nations or something there of that holds them.
And should anyone committ a haneous crime, IE IRAQ II then this nations will vote, convene and decide wether the use of these weapons would REDUCE the
number of innocents killed by the agreesive nation, compared to the amount of people killed OF the aggresive nation, forcing them to stand down.
You can only be accepted into this voting nation, once you BUILD the bomb, because that shows your country is ACTUALLY trying to excel in science,
physics etc etc, something that can benefit the world.
And once you build it, you give it to them to use.
If this group was around in 2003, and NO ONE had nuclear weapons... Would the united states of Invaded Iraq, resulting in the biggest conflict man is
ever going to witness? knowing full well the world would of voted to 'nuke' DC rather than allow the invasion?
Imagine if Iraq did build a bomb, and were voted into this nation.
Here's the US, threatening to invade... the nations vote that the US is about to commit a grave crime, based on lies for corporate gain.
They vote 89-11 to use the bomb to force the US to stand down.
They use the Iraqi bomb to provide maximum effect..... this would STOP more wars, than bombs do. because you'd only go to war, if your nation
depended on it, and before that happens, the nation your defending yourself against would already been dealt with.
food for thought.
[edit on 3-9-2007 by Agit8dChop]