posted on Dec, 9 2007 @ 01:18 AM
I am not good at following up things, very often. This reply is rather late.
When I read your post, I had the thought that your material will be good to link to from articles about tinWiki. I also believe that, even if the
response was not as good as you hoped for, you did improve tinWiki's basis and fundament. Every step counts.
Lately, I have done some minor -- but hopefully 'key' -- improvements in tinWiki itself. My thoughts, after having done some edits of that type now,
is that, in addition to publicity and 'spreading the word', it is also important to improve 'useability' at the tinWiki website itself. That is
what will allow visitors to want to come back over and over again, and will also improve the possibility of awareness of tinWiki spreading by 'word
of mouth'. And part of the fundament of that whole process of tinWiki being improved and getting better known is precisely stuff such as your
P.S. I came across tinWiki by coincidence and not through ATS, and frankly my knowledge of ATS was very superficial and it actually was some time
before I realized that tinWiki was related to this ATS place I'd seen now and then in the past. My not noticing that your material had already been
published of course reveals that I still can't actually call myself an ATS-er. Being slow to catch on to things, it's actually just recently that
I've started to check out the ATS newsletter when I receive it in my e-mail... Well, I guess that's enough confessing for now. :-)