Originally posted by mushninja
Continuation....
The UN and American forces mentioned above now have years of experince fighting civilians that are defending their homeland in an urban setting. Whats
more, they have RPGs, and a wide range of other stuff that you don't have. And they are kicking their asses. Do you reallly think you and you deer
rifle are going to stop a unit of experinced soliders rolling tanks and 50 cal machine guns? I'm not saying we don't have a chance or shouldn't
fight, # no. Just saying, it ain't going to be like the movies and it ain't going to be like you think. I think we are mostly screwed and mostly big
talking cowards. I think we would do best to avoid such things by rising up and being heard NOW. Not taking this anymore, refusing to play this game
while standing together. They only have the power and athority you give them. If we all stood up and spoke/acted as one tomorrow just think what we
could do!!! Who is with me???!!!! Yeeeaaaahh, didn't think so.

A fair post, but one that is posted by someone who hasn't actually worked with UN troops.
I have, they are practically useless unless you use American or British troops to bolster them.
Believe me, we Brits have long memories and I can see a big 2 fingers going up if the UN told us we'd be deploying to the USA again on a
'peace-keeping role or otherwise'.
All other nations tend to be a lot more defensive and hate to go on the offensive. The reason? It's a lot more dangerous to go out and look for the
enemy than it is to sit tight and do nothing in the bases.
Think I'm talking bs? Look at where all the major operations in Afganistan and Iraq are happening and look which nationalities are doing the
offensive work. It is almost always Brits or US forces.
You want to see how effective the UN is at even being a defensive entity?
Then just look how the Dutch failed at doing that in Srebrenica, Bosnia.
And I'd wager that the local populace in the States would be a lot more defiant than meek civilians in Bosnia.
Being a soldier fighting civil inssurection is a major head-ache, the enemy is hidden and won't fight conventionally.
The Northern Island conflict would be a paradise compared to an army trying to pacify a US population.
A survivalist wouldn't have to fight. But he/she wouldn't have to co-operate either.
It's not rocket science to fight against an armies infrastructure.
If you want a historical example, just look at your very own war of independence. You fought against a government then and pulled victory out of the
bag.
But it seems that threads like this bring out a fair few defeatists in you.