I agree whole-heartedly, except for the last part. In fact, I completely disagree on that sentiment. The reason being, when people get very fired up,
it's easy to lose your cool. It's easy to start posting emotional responses, not sticking to the facts. This completely derails the topic, as
emotion is responded too with a higher priority than facts or actual argument.
For instance, if I walked up to an African American and said, "excuse me, **SNIP**, could you tell me what came first, the chicken or the egg?" How
do you think he's going to answer the philosophical side of that question? I'd bet that he doesn't even bother indulging my query, but instead hits
me.
To be PC, I'll give this gentlemen the benefit of a doubt, and assume he would just walk away, not starting a fight.
But the reality of the situation, at least on forums, is that 9 times out of 10, that kind of situation would result in a fight. The emotional, hot
headed insults easily cascade into a blow by blow, post reply and post, cycle that only ends when one person says **SNIP** and stops replying (which
usually doesn't happen for at least several cycles.) This completely derails a topic, and given enough people read it, inevitably reignites when a
new poster inflames either of the parties, or viewers, which starts the cycle over again.
I think that's why insults and foul language are banned, but did you see what I did in the middle of the paragraph above this one? I think this is
the correct usage of swear words, and beyond that, I was quoting a source, so hopefully I don't get banned for this post
Hope this helps
MOD NOTE: Remember, no foul language, no circumvention of censors.
[edit on 1-9-2007 by electronQM]
[edit on 1-9-2007 by electronQM]
[edit on 1-9-2007 by spacedoubt]