Originally posted by yuefo
This a such a good, concise summary of one of my favorite cases.
Thanks. This entry, and a few more I'll be uploading shortly, are leading up a submission that I'm planning to the ATS newsletter.
I'm unfamiliar with tinwiki
I'm fairly unfamiliar with it myself...
, and I'm curious about how consistency is handled. Specifically, I notice that you use British rules with quotation marks. Does there just have to
be consistency within a document or are American rules generally followed? I've been a proofreader for 22 years and can't help noticing things like
that.
One of the Tinwiki editors might be able to help. I just aim for consistency within my own articles, and wait for someone to shout at me if I'm
doing it wrong!
Personally, I hope that members aren't put off posting to the Tinwiki because of fears that they might not know all the "house style" rules.
I think Tinwiki has a lot of potential to reduce the amount of reinvention of the wheel, but it will only fulfil that potential if more members help
build up the content.
I created a few entries about a year ago, but haven't bothered much since because it seems a fairly futile exercise unless more people post to, and
use, the Tinwiki. However, I've decided that I might as well do what I can to raise the profile of Tinwiki on ATS [assuming the Tinwiki editors
don't think that this is treading on their toes] - and creating the current batch of entries is part of my grand scheme...
All the best,
Isaac
|