Originally posted by WeAreOne
To mark jaxson and any other like minded people who do not swallow the rubbish spoon fed to them through the lies that is education and schools e.g.
why teach the theory of evolution as proven when it is quite clearly not?
point out any lies and point out why evolution is not proven, if you would.
You are right to question evolution. It shocks me at the stupidity of some people to accept a theory A THEORY (some one else's idea) about something
which if anything has been more disproved in the last 100 or so years since Darwin proposed his IDEA (theory).
you show a general misunderstanding of science here.
He said himself that as the fossil record got more detailed over time (as in his time they were barely scratching the surface and didn’t have
anywhere near the amount of fossils they have today) and more fossils were recovered/found it would add credibility to his THEORY. On the contrary it
has done the opposite.
um... we've used evolutionary theory to predict many fossils that we've found... including one of (if not the) the first fish with the ability to
traverse land.
Do not make the mistake of confusing adaptation for evolution (WE ADAPT TO CHANGES ONLY FOR SURIVIAL THEN REVERT BACK ONCE CONDITIONS IN THE
ENVIROMENT RETURN TO A SO CALLED NORMAL STATE (this is one thing that has been proven). IT IS WRITTEN INTO US TO BE THE WAY WE ARE, SOMETHING CALLED
D.N.A.) We react for survival then revert.
refrain from slamming on the CAPS, it doesn't help the argument.
nobody will argue that a person reacting to environmental conditions won't revert to genetically encoded trends...
evolution says that beneficial mutations are passed on, not non-genetic adaptations, you clearly don't understand this part of the theory.
Take X-men for example; they are supposed to represent humans who have gone into the SUPPOSED next stage of human evolution but what are they classed
as Hmmmmmmm oh yes mutants. They are considered freaks (non-human/wrong); does this not tell you something?
yes, it tells us that stan lee and jack kirby weren't exactly paying attention in biology class or forgot anything they learned of evolution and that
they were making commentaries on puberty and racism through the pages of comic books...
Originally posted by WeAreOne
1. Where are all the fossils showing half formed human's with half formed arms, fingers, legs etc etc (This does not apply to human's alone)?
evolution doesn't predict this..
2. Where are all the half formed ape's and half formed human's hanging out these days (I supposed they all turned into humans but then hang on why
are there still apes around if they all turned into Human's; very muddy water indeed)?
again, half-forms aren't predict by evolution
and apes are still around because we share a common ancestry with them, no evolutionary biologist would say that humans evolved from chimps,
orangutans, or gorillas.
3. Why in the billions of years of earths past has there never been another creature/animal to achieve our level of intelligence (to challenge our
dominance of earth); are we supposed to believe in chance alone in this too?
because evolution moves towards survival, not intelligence... intelligence isn't necessary for survival. good example is the great white shark, dumb
as a rock yet an efficient killer.
Lastly is it so difficult to believe in some higher form of intelligence or that something more than mere chance took a hand in our creation, earth's
creation and even the universe.
well, when there is absolutely no evidence to support it.... YES.