It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Where Will the Next Large Scale Terrorist Attack in the U.S Take Place?

page: 2
<< 1    3 >>

log in


posted on Sep, 1 2007 @ 01:52 PM
Blowing up stuff is played out. If terrorist act they will poison and kill ppl with chemicals. They would attact the food supply at stores I would think.

posted on Sep, 1 2007 @ 01:53 PM
Anywhere except Boston, they need Boston for its strategic usage of people not caring and lack of security of any kind, plus too many muslims and muslim charities based in Boston.

posted on Sep, 1 2007 @ 02:10 PM
reply to post by markjaxson

Not sure if you're aware of this but Sollog is full of crap and a scam. Don't count on those things coming true. I hope for your sake you did some research and didn't pay whatever horrendous fee you need to see his stuff.

posted on Sep, 1 2007 @ 02:19 PM
thankyou for your kind comment chinabean.

good thoughts everyone, I am thinking that a terroristic thing to do would be to 'bomb' nuclear reactors. if one could strategize(word?) an attack on 4 of these reactors that would do some dame and leave a lot of people in the dark. however, i dont think that they would follow this game plan.

maybe as someone mentioned they will go the poison necessities routine. or possibly as someone else mentioned they will sabotage our credt agencies.

its hard to say for sure one way or the other, but one thing i am sure about is that they are probably planning it as we speak.

posted on Sep, 1 2007 @ 03:02 PM
Violet to start off i enjoy your post's.

But to talk about such thing's is pretty negative no ? I understand you are an American!

I am English!

When you put such an idea out is it due to the fact you are concerned about something ? Or maybe confused ?

Are you expecting something ?

What is your personal feeling on it ?

Warm regard's

posted on Sep, 1 2007 @ 03:15 PM
reply to post by behindthescenes

no assignments have been made to my knowledge concerning Washington DC.

posted on Sep, 1 2007 @ 07:53 PM

Originally posted by agent violet
thankyou for your kind comment chinabean.

maybe as someone mentioned they will go the poison necessities routine. or possibly as someone else mentioned they will sabotage our credt agencies.


posted on Sep, 1 2007 @ 11:38 PM
It'll be somewhere in the west, California or Washington. The nuke or dirty bomb will be put there so the prevailing winds carry the radioactive dust as far as possible and into the most populated areas as possible. Simple.

posted on Sep, 2 2007 @ 07:34 AM
correct me if i'm wrong but..I believe there was a third page earlier?

what happened? did someone use thier ninja editing skills? I remember reading and quoting another member on the 3rd page and said something about the members quote. what happened?

posted on Sep, 2 2007 @ 08:21 AM
Interesting thread and a topic not talked about enough (unlike the collapes of the WTC's)

My personal belief is this....

They will strike with a device (nuclear in nature) but only to do one simple thing.....


The effects of this would be greater then we could imagine....(wait hold on) some very good imaginations on this site....ok ok with jokes a'side...
image for a moment....if all the power was shut-down on a quite winter day???? and would last for months' maybe years.
we would be talking about 100's of thousand would die.

This is the greatest threat we are dealing with.

The terrorists would have a laugh and bragging rights .... and prob.
get more support to cont. the fight
look we took down the all mighty USA with just shuting down all
the power. And one nuclear device above the usa would shut down everything electrical (not protected) from horizon to horizon....never mind if they do this with multiple bombs poss. above other countries.

Y'r Canadian friend,

PS And yes Canada will always be ready to go onto USA soil (without an uproar') we are y'r bothers to the North and are with you to the end.

posted on Sep, 2 2007 @ 08:24 AM
If it will be a false flage dirty nuke attack... it will be a secondary city that does not harm the US economy too bad.

posted on Sep, 4 2007 @ 02:25 PM

Originally posted by ElectRon41
The nuke or dirty bomb will be put there so the prevailing winds carry the radioactive dust as far as possible and into the most populated areas as possible. Simple.

Dirty bombs are ineffective. Its been proven a person would have to stand where the bombs went off for over a year to have any possible radioactive poisoning.

Clip is under one of the episodes of that documentary.

posted on Sep, 4 2007 @ 08:27 PM
when the waters flow, the children shall be lost and the mothers will weep,

for no one is safe, especially in their sleep,

the dams are blown, their numbers are three,

great loss of life and property, woe to you and me.

posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 03:06 AM
Unfortunately I believe 9/11 was an inside job, so as per recent tradition the next false flag attack will involve explosive devices.

My prediction is that the Sears tower will be the target, using a mini-nuke suit case style device with fall-out radiation spreading throughout the city and to water nearby, designed to spark fear and panic among the population. Contamination of the Mississippi River may also be a tactic to spread more fear.
Some sort of government department may also be a target to eliminate any foreseen threats that might expose the plot. Martial law will be declared because of this but I can't rule out some sort of biological or 'designer' disease type scare either.

IMO, If the threat from the Middle East was real like the Bush Administration (and the media, dems etc) want you to believe, there is much that could have been done to terrorize the population along time ago. Having said that, there appears to be more enemies of the US created now than ever before so now there are obviously more people willing to do crazy things. Strategy of tension perhaps?
A FU world we live in.

[edit on 5-9-2007 by cams]

posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 04:29 AM
A while ago I heard someone talking about the idea of setting off a bomb, maybe nuclear at something like yellowstone park in order to try and set off the volcano, the same idea I guess could apply to fault lines. I can't remember where I saw this, and don't know if it's feasible or even possible, but it sounded pretty bad.

I think the guy a few posts back talking about 100 or so terrorists going on a machine gun/grenade rampage was horrific, but well founded, especially if these people have spent time in militant camps training with weapons, I think they could kill a lot more people than most car bombs do, before someone takes them out.

posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 05:13 AM
You don't like to think that terrorists would actively target the children, but then I just remember all the non-terrorists that do just that for their own needs and it may not be such a leap
There were seventeen (17) school buses stolen in the Houston area last week

The Houston Police Department's Criminal Intelligence Division, the FBI and the Harris County Sheriff's Office are all concerned about a large number of school buses that have been stolen in the Houston area over the last several months.

Seventeen large, yellow school buses were stolen recently from various charter schools, business schools and private bus companies. Not one has disappeared from HISD.

Most, if not all, were taken from locations on Houston’s north side. One off west Tidwell, another from the Lopez bus company off Melrose and Berry streets.

They now believe they were from business schools and privately owned vehicles and were probably taken for scrap.

Investigators from several agencies including Harris County and the FBI believe there is a much stronger possibility that the buses were stolen and simply chopped up so that the scrap metal could be traded in for cash.

Or they believe the buses were stolen and taken across the border into Mexico. But so far, checkpoints along the border have turned up nothing.

Although it looks to be unrelated to terrorism, it has reminded me of this thread - Terrorist plans found to attack US schools and buses within six weeks - and I think this would be high on the list of fears for everyone, even those without kids.

posted on Sep, 5 2007 @ 06:06 AM

would all the deadly & injurous products the Chinese are sending into the US market be considered Attacks ?

this has been escalating fr more than a year now,
the latest is more lead paint on Toys.... the 3rd recall so far as i'm aware

posted on Sep, 8 2007 @ 04:00 PM
I think that the next attack would accure in a small unknown town with less then 20,000 people in it, because I live in a town with less then 10,000 people in it call Prineville, Oregon and you would never think that they would attack there but what if they did then everyone would begin to think that if they could attack a town that small then they could attack anywhere, and also it would show that they really dont care about how many people they kill its more about how many people they can strike fear into and thats all they want to see, just like when 9/11 what happened when the towers fell??, people stopped flying in planes, they were scared @%$#less to fly thinking that that could happen to them and thats what they wanted was to scare people.

posted on Sep, 13 2007 @ 01:28 PM
I have to say that an attack on the "heartland" seems more viable to instill fear in the masses. First thing, you will stir up those who think they are safe from terrorists, because they live in a less metro area or central area of the country (harder to get a bomb to?).

Example: any cities in Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Iowa with ~100,000 people in them.

Another thing... Suburbs - Just the suburbs of Kansas City alone have over 100,000 in them, Olathe being a prime example of "suburbia" easily destroying a larger number of civilians while allowing normal economics elsewhere in the country. If you look at any large city, the suburban areas are overgrown with housing communities so thick, all you can see for miles is rooftops.

If I was a terrorists, I would go for maximum civilian targets intitially to make the government back down in fear of losing large numbers of it's voting population (middle class).

I might even focus on a heart-wrenching historical site just to hurt the morale of the country. Example as above Liberty Bell? Arlington Cemetary?

/put thread

posted on Sep, 13 2007 @ 02:24 PM
I would guess New York City or Washington, D.C.
It will be nuclear.
In the early 1990's I recorded a 4-hour show entitled "Ancient Prophecies" hosted by David McCallum (sp.) with dozens of clips regarding prophecies from all religions and cultures. Several clips fascinated me. One involved the Hopi Prophecy Rock which foretold the coming end of the present civilization (there will be a physical and spiritual 'cleansing') as a result of foresaking nature and growing further and further from our spiritual component. Another involved a group of Rabbi's who are experts on the Kaballah (sp.) who predict a nuclear attack on an American city as a result of man's 'fall from grace' (even though there is an illustration of the Capitol building frying they don't mention a specific city - i'm not sure how to interpret that). Another was of Edgar Cayce mentioning in a reading about the sinking/destruction of most of Japan and the west coast of the U.S. "BEFORE NEW YORK EVEN".

So many commonalities about future predictions from around the world in ancient times - much like the Noah/Flood story; gets a little scary.
I highly recommend viewing this special if you can get hold of it.

[edit on 13-9-2007 by AtlantisAgain]

top topics

<< 1    3 >>

log in