!!! NORAD TAPES obtained by Loose Change!!!!, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 32 times


reply posted on 30-8-2007 @ 08:51 AM by justyc
reply to post by wenfieldsecret



thanks for that info. would the switching off of the transponders actually have made a difference though as they presumably could still be tracked by conventional radar? it just seems a bit pointless to me if they knew they were going to crash the planes anyway. like the london underground suicide bombers buying return tickets


reply posted on 30-8-2007 @ 08:59 AM by wenfieldsecret
reply to post by justyc



unlike other posters i don't know too much about the ATC radars....but what i do know is that the radars do see alot....but the transponder is so that the controllers no which plane they're dealing with....they'll call your plane and be like "squawk ####" and when the number changes on the radar (next to your dot) then they'll know who they are dealing with....if that number dissappears.....it's just a green dot among many many dots....

tho there is the problem with the pilots being able to change to a hijack code....they prolly would have been instantly killed by the hijackers....

75## is the hijack code...or maybe 76## or 77##....i know those three stand for specific emergincies but i dont know which witch is which......


p.s....everyone saying "breaking news" needs to check out my post at the top of this page.....(page 2)

[edit on 30-8-2007 by wenfieldsecret]


reply posted on 30-8-2007 @ 09:20 AM by Zaphod58
To give you guys an idea of a normal day of air traffic over the United States, this is a snapshot of the FAA FACET control screen. Keep in mind, this is 5 years AFTER 9/11 when air travel levels were supposedly down.

Where's AA11?:



Hint: Every one of those yellow spots is a plane without a transponder code showing.

Matthew5012, the military information came almost exclusively from FAA radar sites. Unless the planes were flying at supersonic speeds, there is no way to tell a civilian airliner flying at 600 knots, and a Russian Backfire flying at 600 knots unless you flagged it coming in over the ocean, and KNEW it was a Backfire before it crossed the coast. At which point you would have tried to intercept it then, not after it was over the US.

[edit on 8/30/2007 by Zaphod58]


reply posted on 30-8-2007 @ 09:26 AM by Griff
Originally posted by Zaphod58


Hint: Every one of those yellow spots is a plane without a transponder code showing.


Yes, but when every other one has a transponder on, and 4 don't, how hard does it become then?


reply posted on 30-8-2007 @ 11:18 AM by eyewitness86
What really gets to me is the fact that many people will believe that the ' highjackers' in all four cases, managed to clear out both pilots from the cockpits and disable the transponders, but they cannot explain how it is that all of the pilots were totally unable to flip a switch and activate the ' Highjack code '.

Imagine 2 pilots up front, in all 4 planes, that is eight people that had to be removed from a cramped and tight space, be replaced by the ' highjacker ' pilots, and then deactivate the transponders. they could do all of that but not ONE pilot in any plane could take one second to flip the switch and notify the highjack. It is impossible, unbelievable, beyond the realm of possibility.

Those pilots would have fought back, would have never given up the cockpits that easily, no matter what. All FOUR cockpit doors must have been standing wide open, right? Then all eight pilots must have for some reason decided, for the first time in aviation history, to let the ' highjackers ' take over the plane, and all with boxcutters!!

Anyone who believes that would no doubt believe that the highjackers could have navigated the craft, flown them expertly and accomplished all this with no training on heavy jets. Amazing what some people will believe.There is no way that scenario could be true. Recall the tapes of Flt. 93, with Cleveland tower speaking to the pilot secons before they did not respond back? It took just a second to lose contact. those aircraft were taken over by automatic controllers and flown wherever.

It is beyond the realm of possibility that eight pilots would have decided to act in a way never before seen, and without a struggle, and without the aircraft displaying signs of being taken over..no way. The whole story we have been asked to swallow is beyond ridiculous and only the gullibility of the people allows it to keep going on.

No matter what the tapes show, there is NO WAY that those aircraft were taken over by men with bladed weapons in an instant..no way. Simply impossible. the pilots would have fought to the death to remain in control of their planes, and the fact that all of the four planes were taken over without a whimper and within seconds tells the tale. The transponders were deactivated the instant that the remote controller took over the computers and directed the planes according to their nefarious plan.

There is no other explanation that makes any sense at all.None. No one could possible believe that four planes could be taken in seconds without any resistance from the crew, and flown to targets far away, with great percision, all by second rate pilots that had NEVER trained in heavy planes. Beyond belief for anyone except a rabid Bushie that can see and hear no evil despite all of the facts. the time it took to overcome the planes tells us all we need to know; it HAD to be done remotely, that is the ONLY explanation that makes any sense.

Why did not ONE pilot flip the switch and activate a highjack code? Are we to believe that not ONE pilot thought this a good idea? While the pilots were allegedly being dragged out of the cockpit, dead or alive another pilot could have and WOULD have flipped the switch. No way that 4 planes failed to do this..impossible. they could not do it because all systems were overtaken from the ground. that is the only answer.


reply posted on 30-8-2007 @ 11:22 AM by justyc
reply to post by eyewitness86



you would have to do a study of hijacked planes and the frequency with which the pilots pressed the button to know whether anything is unusual here.

real world events are sometimes not text book rule examples
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 191 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 12 hours ago, 107 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 8 hours ago, 85 replies