There are a number of issues here I cannot let pass.
1) The word is
TECHNOLOGY NOT "Tech". What is it about you ipod loving, SMS addicted,
"hmmm..think I'll use the lower case "i" in a
sentence instead of the capital form to indicate the first person in written speech", generation "Y'ers", that stops you from correctly using
the English language as it was intended? Which afterall is the theory of CLEAR communication.
2)
well here is my point i am new to the alien believer realm i truely want to believe...
Well here is your primary
problem. You so want to believe, that you have set aside impartial reasoning and the theory that the simplest explanation is usually the right one.
Alien intervention isn't really the simplest explanation now is it?
3)
also there is a point i have heard when the nuke was designed i believe a scientist said that when tech wants to be birthed it will
find a way to be so and if the scientist who thought it up hadnt that someone else would have...
So given what you have stated here,
is it not reasonable to assume that humans have the capacity and means to allow technology to spring forth using our own abillities?
4)
there was documentation that as the person who came up with the bomb idea half way across the world someone else had the same idea so
perhaps this kind of tech wanted to be birthed but i still think perhaps it had some extraterrestial help...
And see now here is my
point neatly put by yourself. On the one hand you illustrate the very resonable principle that technology seems to have an uncanny way of giving birth
to itself. Nothing wrong here, plenty of emminent people have theorised on this little conundrum. And then you point out in relation to this that
often a number of people arrive at the same or simmilar discovery within the same time frame. Again nothing wrong with this comment, I have heard this
phenomenon attributed to branches of chaos theory. But then "Oh dear!", without reason or proof you fall back on the old extraterrestrial help
"feeling".
Why is it that people find it so difficult to believe that the one and so far, only sentient intelligent life form we know of and understand and
understand well, our own, is the one that they see as unable to develop technologically without outside help? What baseline other than ourselves are
they using to measure this by? There is a question here, if we as a species are unlikely to develop certain technologies on our own, then why and how
would any other species hold a greater predisposition towards technological achievement? And why is it that they only ever in these "alien
technology" theories seem to help the US government with weapons or means of control?
LEE.
[edit on 3-9-2007 by thebozeian]