It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Dr Bussards Fusion Project to be Funded Again!

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 28 2007 @ 03:57 AM
link   
Recent emails have indicatd the navy may resume funding for Dr Robert Bussard's POLYWELL reactor.

If this is the case then a fusion reactor proven concept could happen within 3 or 4 years at a cost of about $200 million in a fairly small size reactor.



Conventional hot tokamak fusion is a dead end and they have moved the goal posts to a distant 50 years every year so that it's like the crock of gold at the end of the rainbow you can never actually reach it.They say the first test reactor will cost $12 billion and cover 3 football fields and the actual problem of getting useful energy out of it will take another 20 years!...because of the huge delicate magnetic field coils....the slightest imperfection in the field and the hot plasma touches the wall and loses energy...and the fusion raction stops.

try balancing a pencil on it's point.

imagine a million degree hot circular hot plasma writhing and kinking and twisting.

the tokamak is a VERY stupid design.

look at the sun.what shape is it?

a SHERE!!!

HOT CHARGED PARTICLES CAN GO INWARDS OR OUTWARDS OF A SPHERE OR STAY CONFINED WITHIN THE SPHERE.

but in a tokamak the the particles can go up down left right sideways....touch the walls and lose energy and the moronic idiots in charge have been too arrogant andunwilling to admit this basic and fundamental flaw.a torus shape is the wrong shape and will never work.the sligtest imperfection and the plasma kinks.

The governments have sinking money into this dead end black hole for 50 years without any success and the staff have promising success is just around te corner but when pressed recently admitted 50 years at least and the first TEST reactor will cost $12 billion.


for news of the polywell reactor:-


www.talk-polywell.org...



[edit on 28-8-2007 by esecallum]

[edit on 28-8-2007 by esecallum]

[edit on 28-8-2007 by esecallum]

------------------------
Replaced ALL CAPS in title

[edit on 28/8/07 by masqua]




posted on Aug, 28 2007 @ 04:13 AM
link   
You kind of just nagged about the failed design and forgot to mention the newer one XD



posted on Aug, 29 2007 @ 05:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by Renshin
You kind of just nagged about the failed design and forgot to mention the newer one XD


you are wrong again.

a torus is the worst shape to confine a very high temp unstable plasma.

too many degrees of freedom.why cant you understand that?


50 years of proof it dont work.


beating the same dead horse for years and NOW THEY WANT ANOTHER 50 YEARS!.

THE WHOLE LOT OF THEM SHOULD BE SACKED FOR FRAUD AND MISLEADING THE PUBLIC AND FUNDING STOPPED.

The money diverted to more promising approches.

It is the wrong bloody shape and it will never work.

I t is a nothing more then job club and dead as a dodo juggernaut that is consuming our money and nothing to show fot it.

it is a dead end.

their asymtotic progress proves it will never work.

they cant even figure a way any to get any energy out of it as the whole stupid thing has to be encased in gigantic delicate magnetic fields which cannot be disturbed even slightly.I already mentioned this above and your precious 500 degree lithium will never be able to go near it as there is no space for it!

I mean the whole thing has to be encased in delicate magnetic fields BY THEIR OWN ADMISSION.... how are you going to any get energy out of it...?

I am going to write to the Government and start a massive lobby campaign to get this massive environmental waste stopped.

stop making excuses for it..we need to stop the tokamak parasites.

THEY have been promising and hoodwinking fusion for 50 years and getting VAST funding on that BASIS from the taxpayer.

do you relly think politicians would pour VAST sums into ACADEMIC reasons to study confinement.

i never quoted Dr Bussard...DO YOU REALLY THINK other people cannot arrive at similar conclusions after seeing to 50 years of failure?




why should we not discredit ITER tokamak fusion?

they were very quick to discredit cold fusion and went so far as to post fake results...it was M.I.T WHO DELIBERATELY altered the graph showing excess heat to show zero.....this is well documented and M.I.T admitted it.

Yet cold fusion excess heat has been replicated at over different labs worldwide...but cannot be explained by current theories....yes..yes and it cannot be harnessed reliably...yes..yes ,...i... know yes...and study papers denied peer review thanks to the ITER leeches.



posted on Aug, 30 2007 @ 04:12 AM
link   
Could we organize a mass demonstration to promote this new theory?

outside every university and tokamak center?

an UNOCCUPIED expensive tokamak could be held hostage and would be THREATENED to be smeared in grease up if the tokamak people refused to listen to us..not actually greased up.....or better still... we could simply paint the labs with polywell graffiti...

we could have a massive protest with scantily clad girls pole dancing and shouting injustice done by the tokamak people.and the money conned by them.

WE COULD HAVE DANCING BEARS WITH DWARVES ON THEIR SHOULDERS.

we could have BATMAN AND SUPERMAN AND CAPATAIN AMERICA HOLDING HANDS.

we could have massive publicity by using tesla coils and lightening effects on the the cavelcade lorries.

naked girls and naked men (to satify the gays) could paint streamers on their bodies...with polywell reactor.logo's painted on their naked bodies.

this would make people wonder what it is about...generate a buzz.

excitement.

green painted dwarves could carry plasma globes so ordinary people could understand it.


This could generate massive publicity.


Or a a polywell enthusiast could threaten to jump of famous tall building like the Empire State or similar.

they would not ACTUALLY jump....

just pretend they were going to jump...

media circus could be invited...to witness the pretend death jump.


girls in bikini's or baywatch swimsuits girls on horseback could ride in town carrying plasma globes...with polywell reactor painted on their bikini tops.


at baseball matches semi naked girls and semi naked men to satisfy the gays could ran across the pitch carrying support pollywell messages.

or the future is pollywell.

we could get acrobats swinging like spiderman from buildings and dropping pollywell leaflets...


we could bust into newsrooms screaming pollywell reactor is being suppressed.

generating more buzz and excitement.



the name should be changed from polywell to Polly Well? to generate curiosity.

a possible logo.

"Let's succeed with Polly!.. Well?"

""Donate to make Polly Work!" Well?"

we need to be innovative and imaginative.


What do you people think of these bold publicity and awareness generating Ideas?



posted on Oct, 3 2007 @ 06:45 AM
link   
It's worth investigating. However, Bussard has made some rather dubious claims. The output of his last reactor which was destroyed during testing was if not mistaken based solely on the measurement of two (yes two) neutrons. The statistical significance of this is rather dubious if you ask me. His claims towards the output increasing with a factor r^5 or r^7 whatever it was regarding scaling up the radius r of the reactor are also dubious.




top topics
 
1

log in

join