This topic is in the Aircraft Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


SR-72 Confirmed: Mach 6 Project Blackswift


<<  7    8    9    10    11    12    13  >>



reply posted on 3-6-2008 @ 07:53 AM by Canada_EH


Awesome find Dan. I was never aware of this project and your right in saying that visually the 2 look very similar. I had to pull some of those images for my own library of pictures. I'm going to do a bit more research and see just what the goals where and the overlap of these 2 programs.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-6-2008 @ 01:39 PM by Dan Tanna


Hi Canada.

Yeah loFlyte was my suspicion, and the more i rolled around the net looking for stuff the more it seemed that Lockheed farmed out the early stuff to a company we would over look.

Now, I know there is a HiFlyte version... but its dead end on the net in regards to project info / flights ect.

Seems to be the developmet stage went blacker than black.

N.B. Bearing in mind LoFLYTE stand for Low Observable Flight Test Experiment I think this may be part of your puzzle.

[edit on 3-6-2008 by Dan Tanna]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-6-2008 @ 05:08 PM by Dan Tanna


In 1997 the Third MACH 10 body was 80 % complete and thats from Robert Paps mouth himself !



A second vehicle has been completed and a third, with a Mach 10 shape, is 80% complete, says Pap. Rapid prototyping is used to build the airframes, based on computer-derived conical flowfields.



So if in 1997 they had the MACH 10 craft 80% complete, I really am starting to think that this Groom lake hanger is the test / storage area for the full productions article (maybe small scale, say ten articles or so) and that it will be another decade at least till we see this in the white world.

www.flightglobal.com...

Go to the bottom of the article - but do read the whole thing because it is VERY interesting to say the least.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-6-2008 @ 09:05 PM by Dan Tanna


Hey I got mailed a full Hi-Res image from some one and it is of the wind tunnel model.

The detail is fantastic and it is in colour!




This is just a snip of the image, the full size is huge.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-6-2008 @ 03:40 PM by Canada_EH



Originally posted by Dan Tanna

A second vehicle has been completed and a third, with a Mach 10 shape, is 80% complete, says Pap. Rapid prototyping is used to build the airframes, based on computer-derived conical flowfields.




To be clear Dan I think the idea behind at least the first of these models was to test controllability of these "shapes" at low speed. Nothing in the quoted area makes me think they actually has a mach 10 capable plane/model. Only a speculated/informed idea on the shape that said aircraft would be and testing an area of flight that a smaller company like this can afford.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-6-2008 @ 08:03 PM by Dan Tanna


deleted because what I posted was 100 % wrong.






Next time..... next time i'll be right! (maybe ? )

[edit on 5-6-2008 by Dan Tanna]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-6-2008 @ 09:51 PM by Dan Tanna


SR-72



Intelgurl - thanks for the search pointers.


Looks like this is longer and slimmer than the model on the stand wants us to believe. What a bloody beauty!

This I am looking forward to seeing in the skies

Oh and have a sneaky peaky at the under side of the model on the stand.



space

Now thats a beauty.

[edit on 5-6-2008 by Dan Tanna]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-6-2008 @ 10:17 PM by Jezza


imagine dash speeding to launch point and lobbing
cruise missiles at targets.
it does resemble the green thunderbird though........ or evolution of



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-6-2008 @ 10:55 PM by Dan Tanna


Hit any where on the globe within a two hour window, over flight any defences at any time of day or night...

Thats one hell of a system.


Looking forward to seeing it in the skies above us !



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-6-2008 @ 09:25 PM by Dan Tanna



YouTube Link


Hot dammit ! thats a fantastic video. Looks absolutely gorgeous. Hope the videos embedded correctly.




YouTube Link



and Intelgurl, is that you in the video ???

Could some one please help me get the vids to show ? thanks.

[edit on 6-6-2008 by Dan Tanna]

[edit on 6-6-2008 by Dan Tanna]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2008 @ 06:02 AM by Jezza


Aurora (also credited as the SR-91 Aurora) is the popular name for a hypothesized American reconnaissance aircraft, believed by some to be capable of hypersonic flight at speeds of Mach 5+. According to the hypothesis, the Aurora was developed in the 1980s or 1990s as a replacement for the aging and expensive SR-71 Blackbird. A British Ministry of Defence report released in May 2006 refers to USAF priority plans to produce a Mach 4-6 highly supersonic vehicle, but no conclusive evidence has emerged to confirm the existence of such a project. It is believed by some that the Aurora project was canceled due to a shift from spyplanes to high-tech unmanned aerial vehicles and reconnaissance satellites which can do the same job as a spyplane, but with less risk of casualties.

link with video

anyone seen this



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2008 @ 11:02 AM by Jezza


Found this from bill sweetman

The Skunk Works Points To The Future
Posted by Bill Sweetman at 6/11/2008 2:24 AM CDT

At the AUVSI show, Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works revealed new versions of some familiar programs and showed that some projects are livelier than we thought.

Everyone can stop using the photo that we took at DARPATech last year, showing Lockheed Martin's concept for the Blackswift hypersonic research vehicle. (See our earlier reporting here and here.) The real design looks a little different, rather than resembling a scaled-down Falcon HCV.


linky



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2008 @ 03:34 PM by darksidius


Thank you Jezza for this new, its very interesting. This is the new design of the HTV-3X , look very high speed plane.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-6-2008 @ 12:02 AM by Anonymous ATS





reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-6-2008 @ 12:22 AM by Joe Z


reply to post by TAGBOARD



Tagboard,

I think others and myself are concern about open source information, that's all I'm gonig to say. Keep the tread going but everyone be careful, there's a thin line.

Thanks,
Joe Z.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-6-2008 @ 12:43 AM by Joe Z


reply to post by intelgurl



Intelgurl,

I agree with you, this did get a little bit out of hand. I will have to check with my security dept before I post any thing about NGB.

Thanks,
Joe Z.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-6-2008 @ 12:46 AM by Joe Z


reply to post by Bhadhidar



Bhadhidar,

I see you are here also, just making sure the information is limited.

Joe Z.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-6-2008 @ 08:47 PM by bios



Originally posted by Joe Z
just making sure the information is limited.


If you had any bit of authority to make sure the information was limited you wouldn't saying this - you would be "lurking" in the shadows saying nothing and having FBI agents at the door of those who actually broke OPSEC regs.

This is just another typical grab for attention and notoriety, except the members of the Aircraft Forum are too sophisticated to swallow your hook.

No one responds, everyone recognizes you for what you are and no one really cares... hence the silence.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-6-2008 @ 10:49 PM by Canada_EH


Stared and thank you Bios for finally saying it.
-Good to see you are still lurking
Hope all is well with you and natalie. Do you know if she will ever start posting to a blog again or anything? If not it is understandable just miss the insights
Look forward to seeing where black-swift goes along as its not black like the possible polecat. I'm wondering if you have hunch about polecat bios as some of us here think its possible it has went black and a new prototype my already be flying as its been 2 years now.
Sorry its a bit off topic but this thread has slowed a bit so maybe I'll get away with this one quick question.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-6-2008 @ 03:53 PM by 2stepsfromtop



Originally posted by intelgurl
The original image given out by the USAF for this project (dubbed the SR-72)looked like this...





Don't know about the timeline, but I saw something that had the same shape from the bottom flying over the west end of the San Fernando Valley about four years ago. The only reason I looked at it was because the engine sounded 'odd', kinda like a jet sputtering. Now this is a hghly populated area, but as any local knows, on a hot day in the valley people are inside in the AC and not watching the skies. The area is also home to a few remaining black project companies and close to Lancaster/Palmdale.

[edit on 21-6-2008 by 2stepsfromtop]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  7    8    9    10    11    12    13  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:















































ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.141 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread