Jim Fetzer´s theory

here the basic facts of Mr. Fetzer´s theory will be discussed .
ONLY FACTS. NO PERSONAL ATTACKS.

in order to keep up the good work of the whole truth movements, this is important in view of the actual case.
nomoregames.net...
www.csmonitor.com...

it is really more than strange, that this case isn´t discussed in public, but absolutely secret.


till last week I thought CD is the most plausible thing, but the use of a giant direct energy weapon(microwave weapon? please correct me) would explain such anomalies as

- the massive power that is the reason for total pulverisation of concret and steel of WTC buildings (except WTC 7 with CD)

- the destruction (not ´collapse´) from top to the end.

-´toasted´, rusted cars , totally or partly



could this be a disInfo site? makes this sense?
drjudywood.com...

we want the truth, not a false flag suit.







[edit on 25-8-2007 by anti72]

[edit on 25-8-2007 by anti72]

Well the DEW was in the WOOD document.
Dr. Judy Wood's (8 megabyte pdf file, picture intensive) legal "appeal" of the "initial denial" can be downloaded at this link

And then I saw 911 mysteries
where Pyroclastic flow might have caused the damage.


See fused steel and concrete globs from lower levels, good for the next time
anyone asks if molted metal was ever discovered.

Survivor on 81st floor says he saw plane, Stanley Praimnth, and was rescued by
Brian Clark seem to confirm a plane involvement.

Now there is no need for a hijack, only one determined pilot as with JFK JR or
the Egypt Air pilot... (see JFK JR on youtube.. no need for fuel cut off this time)

That leaves the Arab pilots off the hook. How is it done.. find the mk ultra pilot
training grounds.. we found the anti Castro camps didn't we.

So it looks like plenty of thermite explosives.

DNA evidence of a South Tower airliner passenger was announced and as the no planers
are denounced by some, we don't need planes when you have Thermite.

The official plane crash looks true, but was there a lone pilot.

And not the hijackers as stated, you only need one as demonstrated twice before.

Does the truth hurt or did I spin an new 911 tale.

here the basic facts of Mr. Fetzer´s theory will be discussed .
ONLY FACTS. NO PERSONAL ATTACKS.

There seems to be some truth in many of the movements or videos.

911mysteries is mostly about building collapse not a viable reason for
the 9/11 WTC destruction by Arab airline pilots.

I just recently came across some incident reporting that made me think
of "the opposite" .... good for Sen Craig I think, but think the opposite:
no Arabs, no airliners, no pilots, yes explosions.. what ever your mind
thinks is the right think to think... you are in error.

till last week I thought CD is the most plausible thing, but the use of a giant direct energy weapon(microwave weapon? please correct me) would explain such anomalies as

- the massive power that is the reason for total pulverisation of concret and steel of WTC buildings (except WTC 7 with CD)

- the destruction (not ´collapse´) from top to the end.

-´toasted´, rusted cars , totally or partly

Well no matter how much you think a Tesla mechanical building destructo
vibrator might have be converter to an invisible vibratory beam,DEW,
it can still be done with Pyroclastic flow due to explosions.

See my second sig link...subbasement pyroclastic flow...

And, invisible rays coming from invisible places can't replace all the
series of explosions.

Originally posted by anti72
here the basic facts of Mr. Fetzer´s theory will be discussed .

Can someone please post a summary of the key facts of Dr. Fetzer and Dr. Wood's arguments and their sources?

just links:
Reynolds Makes a Federal Case of 9/11 —
Sues NIST Contractors for 9/11 Plane Fraud
nomoregames.net...
Unsealed Complaint PDF here:
nomoregames.net...
NIST official report:
wtc.nist.gov...
Dr. Judy Wood's Request for Correction
www.drjudywood.com...

Supplement One
www.drjudywood.com...


Supplement Two
www.drjudywood.com...


Dr. Judy Wood's (8 megabyte pdf file, picture intensive) legal "appeal"

www.drjudywood.com...


Dr. Judy Wood has a page
www.drjudywood.com...


, Dr. Steven Jones filed his 32 page (pdf file, no pictures) "Request for Correction"
www.journalof911studies.com...


Inclusion for consideration of the DEW makes the remote burn damage
hot spots to be evaluated. Perhaps pyroclastic flow from a large amount
of explosives need to be looked at.
The DEW can be easily said to be unknown as laser, electrostatic or EM
vortex evaluation would be out of their league.
Also where and how was it fired.

Hot spots would have to evaluate how strong the explosives were and
can't be blamed on the tower tops.

Did they do poor enough job to look as if they defrauded the governent
of an accurate report.

Can you compile the facts Dr. Fetzer and Dr. Wood are asserting from those websites and represent them here? Just to make it easier to begin discussing them.

[edit on 31-8-2007 by bsbray11]

its about an enhancemant of the ´traditional ´controlled demolition theory of Dr.Jones.Fetzer and him were friends/colleagues, but diverted scientifically.

WTC 7 was bought down with controlled demolition,from the end to top, there they dont differ.

but thermite/thermate cant explain why:

-the massive steel structures have been blown to dust.
there are some videos that show, the pulverisation of steel, while the destruction!
-why there is no MASSIVE damage in the underneath ground (bathtub),
when over 100.000 tons of debris is falling on it? thats unbelivable.
the contrate bathtub would have been broken, so taht the Hudson River would have flooded whole Manhattan! this strange fact didn´t happen!
it wasn´t falling. it was blown to dust..

-the underneath rail ways stayed undamaged!!
-there were found 1400 ´toasted cars´,in the near, without any reason.completely or partly, burnt,rusted, but no gas exploded!
drjudywood.com...
-the massive PULVERISATION clouds.(thermite?hm...)


but we must be careful, bacause the whole truth movemant is in danger, because the CIA isinfiltrating, of course..


[edit on 31-8-2007 by anti72]

[edit on 31-8-2007 by anti72]