posted on Dec, 3 2002 @ 05:57 PM
Well...First of all, he refer's a lot about the ether. The ether, does not exist. It isn't something real. It was a theory once...WAS.
The other thing that sticks out... Just like psychic's have been found as hoax's... He has problem's when there are other's around him...
Let's not forget that he's the only one that we know of whom has even concieved and performed this experiment.
His statement here >>>> :
"If it is definitely proved that there is in the human being a loss of substance at death not accounted for by known channels of loss, and that such
loss of substance does not occur in the dog as my experiments would seem to show, then we have here a physiological difference between the human and
the canine at least and probably between the human and all other forms of animal life."
How can he say definatley proved, when he was the only experimenter known as of today? Unless it has been repeated, it isn't definatley proved. He's
our only source, so what other info do we have to go on?
Just because it was submitted to a scientific periodical, doesn't make it fact. It mean's it was recognized, but not necisarily(SP?) something
true. If that were the case, then many 'wrong' fact's printed in scientific journal's should all be true. The earth should be flat!
I'll use myself as an example for this part...
I've heard about god for many year's until I was stopped being forced to goto church by my mom. I still don't believe in god though. Why do you
still believe the experiment and word of ONE guy? Despite all I was taught (most of it thankfully forgoten), I still never believed in some
supernatural being who is flawed even more than man himself... Why should you believe the word of ONE man, who's experiment is flawed, his idea
nothing more than a theory, and had problem's when people were around during the experiments?
If you look at how some psychic's have been found as hoax's. The simalarities(SP?) are too much to be discredited...