It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
For those of you who continue to say that "America was never isolationist," look at this.
American isolationism
As defined by its adherents themselves, isolationism had nothing to do with opposing American involvement in world economic, cultural, humanitarian, or even, to a much more limited degree, political affairs. Instead, being an "isolationist" in the 1930s meant that one wanted America to maintain an absolute neutrality in military-political conflict overseas, to keep its freedom of action in international security matters, and to avoid war at almost any cost.
Originally posted by Johnmike
[That is non-interventionism and what I support 100%. I don't use the word "isolationism", because it often means economic and cultural isolationism as well.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
In other words, you really don't support what I am suggesting.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Because when I say isolationism, I basically do mean that America should cut itself away from the rest of the world. Of course, there would still be limited trade, but all of the intervention and humanitarian aid would cease.
Originally posted by xmotex
Had WW1 been less of a rout, WW2 might never have happened though.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
I suppose the next question would be when to intervene.. I personally think that America should stay out of all affairs unless it directly involves us, for a while.