It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


A Reminder About Quoting Wikipedia

page: 1

log in


posted on Aug, 21 2007 @ 06:45 PM
Many posters to this forum often quote or link to wikipedia, myself included. It is regularly used to prove/disprove debates and generally relied upon as a credible source.

A recent article in the New York Times points out the flaws of Wikipedia's accuracy for rather dubious motives.

Last year a Wikipedia visitor edited the entry for the SeaWorld theme parks to change all mentions of “orcas” to “killer whales,” insisting that this was a more accurate name for the species.

There was another, unexplained edit: a paragraph about criticism of SeaWorld’s “lack of respect toward its orcas” disappeared. Both changes, it turns out, originated at a computer at Anheuser-Busch, SeaWorld’s owner.

Luckily, as described in the article, there is a new and easy to use tool to monitor such revisions:

Check out some of the links on the right to see who is saying nice things about themselves.

More on the author of the program:

Thought this was thread worthy and have not seen it elsewhere on this site.


[edit on 21-8-2007 by kinda kurious]

posted on May, 12 2009 @ 10:31 AM
I know this is an old thread - but I just read an article and thought it was rather important and everyone should take note - since Wiki is linked quite often as a source:

Irish student hoaxes world's media with fake quote
By SHAWN POGATCHNIK, Associated Press Writer - Tue May 12, 2009 8:57AM EDT

DUBLIN - When Dublin university student Shane Fitzgerald posted a poetic but phony quote on Wikipedia, he said he was testing how our globalized, increasingly Internet-dependent media was upholding accuracy and accountability in an age of instant news.

His report card: Wikipedia passed. Journalism flunked.

The sociology major's made-up quote — which he added to the Wikipedia page of Maurice Jarre hours after the French composer's death March 28 — flew straight on to dozens of U.S. blogs and newspaper Web sites in Britain, Australia and India.

They used the fabricated material, Fitzgerald said, even though administrators at the free online encyclopedia quickly caught the quote's lack of attribution and removed it, but not quickly enough to keep some journalists from cutting and pasting it first.

A full month went by and nobody noticed the editorial fraud. So Fitzgerald told several media outlets in an e-mail and the corrections began.

"I was really shocked at the results from the experiment," Fitzgerald, 22, said Monday in an interview a week after one newspaper at fault, The Guardian of Britain, became the first to admit its obituarist lifted material straight from Wikipedia.

"I am 100 percent convinced that if I hadn't come forward, that quote would have gone down in history as something Maurice Jarre said, instead of something I made up," he said. "It would have become another example where, once anything is printed enough times in the media without challenge, it becomes fact."

Ah darn! I see it has been posted already:

[edit on 5/12/2009 by greeneyedleo]

posted on May, 12 2009 @ 10:34 AM
If you quoted Wiki at any respectable university you'd fail. Until they get their act together it is NOT credible. Sorry.

posted on May, 12 2009 @ 10:38 AM
Yes, Wiki is definitely not always the best site to link to for information. Though I have had times, when researching that I found Wiki to have accurate information all in one place. So I can then link to Wiki instead of using multiple links.

Sometimes, Wiki can have reliable information, and whenever I link to it, I always research other sites, to assure that the information is accurate. If I find discrepancies I will then link to another site.

I understand that not everyone does that, but I do.

Harm None

top topics

log in