Possible NSA wiretap., page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 21-8-2007 @ 09:14 PM by Crakeur
Originally posted by comedy
Hello all. Long time reader, havent posted in a while, but i need some help.


Registered: 21-8-2007

haven't posted in a while? since you registered all those hours ago?

Originally posted by comedy
Recently, someone in my family has been indicted for federal accusations which would most likely lead to a tap of his internet. He was complaining about the amount of lag on his network so i was assisting him to re-configure it and such.


what you are doing might possibly be obstruction of justice or aiding and abetting. Might want to rethink what you are doing there.

Originally posted by comedy
I know if the NSA was in fact tapping it, they wouldnt use such an obvious network name. But who knows, they might of realized the mistake and took it off the wireless broadcast quickly. Which is what happened.


If the NSA, or any other group, was tapping in to your connection, they would do it brazenly, not caring about your knowledge of the peeping, or they would do it clandestinely and they wouldn't have the need to quickly change the mistake they made. I'm guessing the latter would be the case and you'd never know they were there.

Originally posted by comedy
Anybody ever run into something like this?
Should he be worried for his privacy?
What kind of steps can he do to insure his privacy against wiretaps,internet taps, bugs, ect?


Worry about the crimes you might be committing by assisting him in covering his tracks.

Lastly, I would suggest you not ask the members of this site to assist you in foiling a federal investigation as that would be asking them to break the law and that is against our Terms and Conditions.


reply posted on 22-8-2007 @ 10:48 AM by Tom Bedlam
reply to post by comedy



I think the "NSA Wiretap #xxx" you saw was probably a wardriver, given the nature of the name and the brief period of time it was present.

As for the other, I could make guesses about what you're seeing from your brief description but as Crakeur says, telling you how to fix it or sweep your premises with the intent of hindering an ongoing investigation is probably unlawful.

Now for the bad news - if they've issued an indictment, they are convinced that they've already got the evidence they need to convict. It's too late now, anyway.

Any surveillance they're doing at this point is for something else entirely. Crakeur, is it legit to discuss common surveillance procedures?


[edit on 22-8-2007 by Tom Bedlam]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



The Zombie Apocalypse is Real! And it\'s Here Now!
  Posted 14 days ago with 86 member flags
While Americans keep arguing about Trayvon-Zimmerman
  Posted 7 days ago with 79 member flags
The Suspicious Death of MI6 Agent Gareth Williams..
  Posted 17 days ago with 77 member flags
Faked Moon Landing - Amazing Documentary
  Posted 9 days ago with 58 member flags
This is scary!
  Posted 14 days ago with 57 member flags
So you have all heard, watch the animals...
  Posted 5 days ago with 36 member flags