9/11 ABL - Smoking Gun - This Is It, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 28 times
Topic started on 21-8-2007 @ 05:53 PM by 11 11
I know most of you don't like the thread title, I'm sorry, but thats how much faith I have in the information I am about to give you.

If you haven't seen this following video, I highly suggest it:

Google Video Link


If you watch closely, you will see an "orb". Most people have already passed this off as "flying paper", but thats because they stopped looking at it when the fireball showed up. If you keep your eye on it, it does disappear but it comes back, and it even shows up on the fireball and on another building 100's of feet closer to the camera than the WTC's.

Using screen shots and layers, I have drawn out the exact path of this "orb", which happens to be a perfectly straight line.



If you look even closer, you can see that the "orb" meets exactly where the tip of the right wing of the jet impacts the WTC. Almost like this "orb" was tracking the jet's wing tip. But what is this "orb"?



In the same video, near the end, you see this white jet pass by in the sky. This same white jet was filmed over the Pentagon on 9/11.



That's not an ordinary jet, nope, not at all. Take a closer look...



That jet, is the ABL. www.boeing.com...
en.wikipedia.org...



The small "bump" on top of the jet is a tracking laser, this is the laser we saw in the video above. It was tracking the jet that hit the WTC. The reason we only see the laser in this video, is because the camera used had a "darkness assist" or "night assist" mode turned on, which adds the power of infrared to the main camera. This allows normal operation of the camera in dark settings, yet it is NOT a complete "night mode" which is pure infrared.

The main laser of the jet, which is 90 inches in diameter, does not make targets explode, nor disintegrate, but it DOES heat up the object to help melt the exterior.


en.wikipedia.org...

The ABL doesn't burn through a missile, or disintegrate it. Rather it heats the missile skin, weakening it and causing failure due to flight stresses.


DID THE AIRBORNE LASER HEAT UP THE SIDE OF THE WTC'S SO THE JETS CAN SIMPLY SLICE THROUGH THE EXTERIOR STEEL LIKE A COLD KNIFE THROUGH WARM BUTTER??


DID THEY USE THE AIRBORNE LASER TO "SHOOT DOWN" FLIGHT 93??


DID THE 90 INCH LASER SLICE A HOLE IN THE PENTAGON???


I think so......... This is our smoking gun.


**note** I am not claiming the ABL did ALL the work, but it did help the aircraft's do more damage. Possibly helped "weaken the steel" of the WTC's with heat.










[edit on 21-8-2007 by 11 11]

[edit on 21-8-2007 by 11 11]

[edit on 23-8-2007 by spacedoubt]


reply posted on 21-8-2007 @ 06:09 PM by FredT
The white jet aka "the smoking gun" outside of the Pentagon, could just as easliy have been and far more likely the E-4B National Airborne Operations Center which also has the same hump behind the cockpit area.

Also


DID THE AIRBORNE LASER HEAT UP THE SIDE OF THE WTC'S SO THE JETS CAN SIMPLY SLICE THROUGH THE EXTERIOR STEEL LIKE A COLD KNIFE THROUGH WARM BUTTER??


To heat the steel up to that point would require the aircraft to dwell on a side of the WTC for quite a period of time to soften the steel as you postulate. In the process the areas being lased would also begin to burn causing fires within the structure. However, none were evident prior to the jets impact.

Also, its one thing to heat up a paper thin piece of aluminum that comprises a missile case that is moving at mach+ speeds (Think aerodynamic forces) and cause failure and quite another to heat the entire side of a building that large. I am no expert in the field, but it seems to me that the ABL, like THEL and its other incarnations dwell on a relativly small area. The effect you are describing is much akin to the Enterprise using phasers to take out a large area.

The lone ABL is still in test and the COIL laser has not even fired while airborn yet.

Edit to add: You picture of the ABL also does not seem to have the Whitcomb winglets that the ABL has. The E-4 is based on the 747-200 and the ABL is based on the 747-400F which does.

Also the picture of the hole at the Pentagon. If a laser made that whole, please explain the lack of thermal damage on the sides?

Edit: #2 According to Boeing, the COIL is due to be installed in the a/c this year.
[edit on 8/21/07 by FredT]

[edit on 8/21/07 by FredT]


reply posted on 21-8-2007 @ 06:19 PM by wenfieldsecret
Boeing YAL-1
Originally scheduled for operation by 2008, due to development difficulties the program was "rescoped". The current plan calls for a prototype ABL to attempt shoot down of a test missile in 2008, delaying the final production design until after this test. The U.S. Missile Defense Agency (MDA) says this is to allow design changes based on data acquired during the test. In effect it delays the ABL attaining operational capability for several years


it wasnt tested succesfully in flight untill earlier this year

not a one line post

p.s.
from the same link
Boeing completed initial modifications to the 747-400F in 2002, culminating in its first flight on July 18, 2002 from Boeing's Wichita, Kansas facility


[edit on 21-8-2007 by wenfieldsecret]



reply posted on 21-8-2007 @ 06:31 PM by 11 11
Originally posted by FredT
The white jet aka "the smoking gun" outside of the Pentagon, could just as easliy have been and far more likely the E-4B National Airborne Operations Center which also has the same hump behind the cockpit area.



You are right, it very well could be. Although, what about the jet that was next to the WTC in the first video I posted?


Originally posted by FredT
To heat the steel up to that point would require the aircraft to dwell on a side of the WTC for quite a period of time


Are you claiming to know the capabilities of this CLASSIFIED WEAPON?

Originally posted by FredT
The lone ABL is still in test and the COIL laser has not even fired while airborn yet.


And how do you know this for a fact? How do you know the military haven't been secretly testing this TESLA based weapon for many years? All we know is what we are told, that is not exactly the truth.


Originally posted by FredT
Edit to add: You picture of the ABL also does not seem to have the Whitcomb winglets that the ABL has. The E-4 is based on the 747-200 and the ABL is based on the 747-400F which does.


I believe it does, you can even see the one on the left wing right behind the vertical stabilizer. The one on the right wing is a bit harder to see... but they are there.

Originally posted by FredT
Also the picture of the hole at the Pentagon. If a laser made that whole, please explain the lack of thermal damage on the sides?


Heat rises, bricks fall. I don't believe any of the pictures of the hole in the pentagon are exactly how they were after the attack. I believe the fire crew or others chipped away at the hole to get to the dead bodies.


reply posted on 21-8-2007 @ 06:39 PM by wenfieldsecret
reply to post by FredT


thank you, i thought the laser itself had fired succefully in flight....but your article states that it was just the acusition thingy...(sp)

the NKC-135....4 of them...all test aircraft....i can tell you one of them's tail number is 666...kinda awesome aint it?

i'm out for the night...i may reply tomorrow


reply posted on 21-8-2007 @ 06:46 PM by 11 11
I wanted to find the size of the "orb" or "light beam" so I took some measurements.



It shows that the beam is about the size of HALF of the mechanical floors (gray area) of the WTC. The mechanical floors are 2 floors each.


en.wikipedia.org...
Of the 110 stories, eight were set aside for technical services (mechanical floors) Level B6/B5, Floors 7/8, 41/42, 75/76 and 108/109, in four two-floor areas evenly spread up the building.


So the light beam is about the same size as a single floor of the WTC. Which matches with the size of the pentagon hole.



reply posted on 21-8-2007 @ 06:46 PM by FredT
reply to post by wenfieldsecret



Here is a pic from a recent AWST article. man targeting laser or not, would you want to be in that -135





[edit on 8/21/07 by FredT]

[edit on 8/21/07 by FredT]


reply posted on 21-8-2007 @ 06:52 PM by FredT
reply to post by 11 11



11 11 you do realize that the ABL's laser is not visable no?


The laser operates at an infrared wavelength of 1.315 microns, which is invisible to the eye.
www.globalsecurity.org...


To the best of my admittedly limited knowledge on the subject, most of weaponized lasers are invisable to the naked eye (or a conventional camera for that matter)
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 7 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 18 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags