posted on Aug, 25 2007 @ 02:20 AM
reply to post by Klaxmexalix
im sorry, could you repeat that...the missile? so, this supposedly fake airplane fires a missle into the building, gives off a fireball thats
obviously fuel and not high explosives and after an HE loaded missile hits the building it stands for an hour?
so was it a plane or a hologram? did he film a plane or was it a fake? if its a fake why would they put a missile being launched into a fake video?
can we get one theory and stick with it? or at least narrow the field a little if we cant decide on one?
what really bothers me though, this guy calls him at work and lies to him to start with, student doing a 911 memorial for a class? (did i get that
right?) and then assumes its a fake because the guy doesnt want to waste his time? has it occured to anyone that maybe since he DID sign over the
rights to it (more than likely for a pretty penny) that his lawyer feels its in his best interest to NOT answer questions just so that "students from
canada" cant take his quotes and twist them all to hell so that he ends up sounding like he said something he didnt?
gees, i mean if the guy wants to do a conspiracy piece he could have just identified himself as the author of his website and just said to the guy
"hey, this is jeff from (insert site here) and im working on a piece investingating some alternative angles to the govts 911 account, would you be
willing to answer some questions?"
chances are he'd get the same response he got but at least his integrity and credibility would be intact.
at least when CIT did their pentacon movie they were straight up with people about it. i disagree wtih them but respect the fact that they werent out
there lying to people to get their story.
[edit on 25-8-2007 by Damocles]