Iran Hangs 30 people Over 'U.S. Plots', page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 20-8-2007 @ 12:36 AM by WyrdeOne
muaddib

The Chinese execute around 10,000 people a year, as far as we know since they keep their executions secret, many of them for lesser offenses, but this is not about the Chinese executions. i also wonder why you put "Americans first" and then the Chinese, when the Chinese execute more than anyone in the world and there are dozens of other countries that execute more than the U.S....


Where in the Hell are you getting your numbers from? Amnesty says 1000 and change, and I've seen other sources claim as high as 3500 per year. Seriously, where did you get that enormous number?

Indeed, Saudi Arabia executes more than the US and I didn't mention them at all. I'm sorry you read too much into the very short list I provided - it wasn't intended as a ranking scale, just two off the top of my head that have high per capita executions.


Again, you said show me when the Iranian regime is executing students and innocent people and you would change your mind...obviously you don't want to change your mind but instead want to give excuses.


I think I said students, union organizers, and hunger strikers, but I can't be bothered to check. Innocence is a relative term, and since we have little or no evidence at our disposal to review, it's a moot point anyway.

You take issue with the fact that Iran executes political prisoners - I can sympathize. However, if we're talking about people actively trying to topple the government..well, the penalty for that sort of behavior is the same in my country..your country too.

The fact that we don't enforce our sedition laws to the same extent speaks to one fact and one fact only, our government is just slightly more afraid of its citizenry than their Iranian counterparts, the Mullahs.


.....Now that's going to the extreme...show me "a retarded person who was executed for being retarded in the U.S in recent years".....and not because he/she murdered someone....


Whoa, misquote. I didn't say we execute retarded people for being retarded, I simply said we execute retarded people.


.....errr, I am sure you must be leaving something out because as far as i know i don't remember hearing or reading anything about a thief being put in jail for life for stealing his third candy bar...


Read up on California's three strikes law if you don't believe me. Google Kevin Weber or Gary Ewing, or Jerry Dewayne Williams. These fellas weren't the sort you'd invite over for dinner, but no matter their previous crimes, 25-life for petty theft is a miscarriage of justice.


Again, now you are just trying to give excuses about what the Iranian regime is doing.

Yes, it is true that the rule of law is needed, but executing people for being political prisoners, or for "having a sharp tongue', or for "having a difference of opinion" is more than having the rule of law to protect citizens, it is down right a dictatorship


Trying to give excuses? It's my opinion, fella, and if you don't like it that's fine. My opinion is that while it's stupid and morally reprehensible to legislate morality, a sovereign nation is entitled to delineate the boundaries of crime and punishment as the citizenry sees fit.

If the citizenry is unhappy with these stupid laws, if they're tired of letting a bunch of psychotic nutters tell them how to eat and dress and speak and make love, they're responsible for changing the status quo.

Nuff said...


reply posted on 20-8-2007 @ 12:50 AM by cavscout
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
HANG THE Criminals..

.......

You were talking about Bush and co right?



My bad!


You use the laughing emoticon while us to hang people? Whats wrong with you? You should be ashamed of yourself.

You couldn’t think your way through a more tasteful way of intentionally derailing a thread?

BTW, I am sure that urging people to hang political figures is somehow against the TOS.

Back on the actual topic: We can say we want about the rule of law, however it is a universal moral in the modern world that people are born with certain, dare I say, "God given rights." Call them "human rights" if mention of The Lord scares you.

Why is it that I see the same people who get blood in their eyes over what they perceive to be U.S. human rights violations turning the other way over Iranian human rights violations?

I never thought it could be, but has Rush Limbaugh been right all these years? Is it true that for many war protesters it’s not about the war but instead about just hating the U.S. and wanting us to loose?

I want out of this war more than any of you that haven’t been there, trust me. But not because of I hate the U.S.; I want my father and my brothers home and more than that I have been there and seen for myself what is going on. I loved Iraq and want to see it at peace.

You know what, I am starting to believe that for some of you it isn’t about caring for Iraq but about hating the U.S.

How sad.



reply posted on 20-8-2007 @ 01:06 AM by Agit8dChop
yes I do,
The same way im sure people scoffed, laughed and cheered when the nazi's were hung.
If I had to chose with continuing this illegial crusuade of 'choice' or the execution of war criminals.. i know where id be standing.

I love the US, for the most part the people are awesome, the land is brilliant and the goals and creations US minds have given the world are second to none.

But I hold the deepest hate for your administration, because it is so clear as to the death and misery their lies have caused.

The saddest part is? Americans confuse our hatred for their leaders, as hatred for them.
Or they chose to, .. why I dont know.
Maybe because feeling victimised for something they didnt bother stopping makes them feel better?

Being a blind patriot is for the most part, the patriots fault.
I mean, a large amount of people saw the curroption in the whitehosue the second the polls closed and the leader was announced.
Few of you realised it when you saw the towers crumble down and ask
'' why didnt they bother stopping that ''

lots of you jumped on board when you illegially invaded Iraq, based on copious amounts of lies that have all been exposed..

yet some of you, still.. to this day.. .argue tooth and nail that murdering Iraqi's in their homes is worthy so long as the government says so.

hatred you say?

I hate every time I see someone on here back up the mindless crap spurted from the administration.


ooooooo, iranians are evil mullahs.... we wont take notice of the hordes or aritcles describing iranian actions, coming form the same media outlets that started this whole Iraqi campaign.

did you not read the article without your '' US IS ALWAYS RIGHT '' blinders on ?

The executions have coincided with a crackdown on student activists and academics accused of trying to foment a 'soft revolution' with US support.


SPIES!

If we had Americans in the US, being helped by the Iranian government to bring about a 'soft-revolution'
what the hell would we do ?

We have no right to be involved in Iran, or Iraq., and we have no right to be declaring them terrroristic in nature, because we are doing the same damn things.

anything that happens to us in regards to the middle east is warranted, because WE STARTED THIS, we had a choice to join our arab neighbours and root out terrorism together.. or wage a costly quagmire against a nation whom didnt deserve it..
and look what we chose.....

Cavscout Im glad you went over there and survived, because we need more people to expierence this folly to understand why war is never the right option.

How many dead women and children did you see?
Do you not think, that these dead women and children are bringing more anti-us mentality than Saddam ever did ?

there's a reason why the whole middle east is ganging up on us.
there's a reason why nations like Iran are hanging people, that are involved with the US government.

and if you still, to this day cannot see WHY... then I am very worried as to the current climate of mankind.


reply posted on 20-8-2007 @ 01:19 AM by Muaddib
Originally posted by WyrdeOne

Where in the Hell are you getting your numbers from? Amnesty says 1000 and change, and I've seen other sources claim as high as 3500 per year. Seriously, where did you get that enormous number?


China

Death penalty

The death penalty continued to be used extensively and arbitrarily, at times as a result of political interference. People were executed for non-violent crimes such as tax fraud and embezzlement as well as drug offences and violent crimes. The authorities continued to keep national statistics on death sentences and executions secret. Based on public reports available, AI estimated that at least 3,400 people had been executed and at least 6,000 sentenced to death by the end of the year, although the true figures were believed to be much higher. In March, a senior member of the National People’s Congress announced that China executes around 10,000 people per year.

web.amnesty.org...


Amnesty said that in 2005, it recorded at least 1770 executions in China, while Chinese academics have said that the number could be up to 10000 a year.

The Chinese Government refuses to publicise the number of people put to death every year and considers the issue a state secret.

www.abc.net.au...


Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Indeed, Saudi Arabia executes more than the US and I didn't mention them at all. I'm sorry you read too much into the very short list I provided - it wasn't intended as a ranking scale, just two off the top of my head that have high per capita executions.


Wyrdeone, the united States does not execute people for "having a sharp tongue", or for "being political prisoners", they do this in Iran and some other countries.

Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Innocence is a relative term, and since we have little or no evidence at our disposal to review, it's a moot point anyway.


Ah, so even if it comes from the horses' mouth as to the reason for executions, such as the 16 year old girl having a "sharp mouth" "it is a moot point" now?

Originally posted by WyrdeOne
You take issue with the fact that Iran executes political prisoners - I can sympathize. However, if we're talking about people actively trying to topple the government..well, the penalty for that sort of behavior is the same in my country..your country too.


No WyrdeOne, there is a big difference between having a difference of opinion, even politically, and having political demonstrations, and murdering people due to any reason....

In the United States people are not sentenced to death for being political prisoners, but we do in certain states if anyone has murdered someone, nomatter the reason, except for self defense.

People demonstrate in the United States against political parties, and unless they become violent and resort to violence, these people can form legal protests, and people are not sentenced to death even if they become violent, unless they murdered someone.


Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Whoa, misquote. I didn't say we execute retarded people for being retarded, I simply said we execute retarded people.


It was me who said that....and again, you are leaving out a fact...those people are not executed for being retarded...they have been executed for murdering someone...

Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Read up on California's three strikes law if you don't believe me. Google Kevin Weber or Gary Ewing, or Jerry Dewayne Williams. These fellas weren't the sort you'd invite over for dinner, but no matter their previous crimes, 25-life for petty theft is a miscarriage of justice.


First of all, it was a bit more than just for robbing chocolate....

News Briefs
October 27, 1995
Web posted at: 10:25 p.m. EDT

Cookie Burglar gets at least 25 years
SANTA ANA, California (CNN) - A parolee could spend the rest of his life in prison for breaking into a restaurant and stealing chocolate chip cookies.

Kevin Weber was sentenced to 25 years to life Friday under California's tough "three strikes, you're out" law.

Orange County Superior Court Judge Jean Rheinheimer said she had no choice because of Weber's two previous felony convictions stemming from a 1988 burglary.

Prosecutors said the six-time parole violator broke into the restaurant to rob the safe after a busy Mother's Day holiday, but he triggered the alarm system before he could do it. When arrested, his pockets were full of cookies he had taken from the restaurant. Family members called the sentence ridiculous and unfair.

The three strikes law was designed to deter repeat offenders by mandating long prison sentences for a third felony conviction.

edition.cnn.com...

This man was not hungry...he wasn't desperate for food, he broke into a restaurant and couldn't open the safe on time, he had a record of robbery, and he knew that a third try would land him in jail for 25 years, yet he did it none-the-less...

Tell me, should people not being arrested and put in prison for "attempt to murder"?....

This man "attempted to rob the safe, and broke into the restaurant...so he did more than jsut "stole chocolates...

Anyways, California's "Three Strikes" requires prison sentences of at least 25 years for those previously convicted of two "serious" or "violent" felonies.

When a person who has committed two previous serious or violent crimes before, continues to show that he/she will rob again, even when they know at the third strike they will land in jail for 25 years, there is a high probability that person will perform another "serious or violent crime"... hence 25 years in prison stops them from commiting a "serious or violent crime". That is the intention of the "Three Strikes" law, to avoid any possible "serious or violent crimes being performed.


Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Trying to give excuses? It's my opinion, fella, and if you don't like it that's fine. My opinion is that while it's stupid and morally reprehensible to legislate morality, a sovereign nation is entitled to delineate the boundaries of crime and punishment as the citizenry sees fit.


Well fella, you did state you would change your mind if you were shown wrong, but you are not changing your mind. That is called, "calling your bluff"


Originally posted by WyrdeOne
If the citizenry is unhappy with these stupid laws, if they're tired of letting a bunch of psychotic nutters tell them how to eat and dress and speak and make love, they're responsible for changing the status quo.

Nuff said...


Does that mean we can't discuss what happens in other countries?

Have you seen anyone in this thread state "let's bomb Iran to the Dark Ages for this"?....

Even if some member would say this, that's his/her opinion, but I never said "we should bomb Iran because of this", and as of yet no other member has.... enough said?


reply posted on 20-8-2007 @ 02:04 AM by seeingevil
Originally posted by WyrdeOne to Muaddib
Where in the Hell are you getting your numbers from? Amnesty says 1000 and change, and I've seen other sources claim as high as 3500 per year. Seriously, where did you get that enormous number?



Uhmm, maybe from Amnesty, the very source you claim you checked with?



Amnesty International Press Release
The death penalty: China continues to execute more people each year than the rest of the world combined. A senior legislator from south-west China recently said China executes "nearly 10,000" people per year. Amnesty International is calling for an immediate moratorium on the death penalty as a step towards abolition.




Honestly WyrdeOne if this had been an official debate over in the debate forum, Muaddib would have won it by a landslide in my opinion.

You act condescending like everything he posts to enforce his points or in rebuttal to you is just trivial and insignificant, but in reality your entire argument best resembles a toothpick on the tracks while Muaddib has rumbled through in a locomotive... Agit8dChop didn't offer any better argument than you did.

.....

This is an interesting, enlightening article that The_Coo posted and referenced, it's relevant to current events in the world and I personally flagged and starred it. I resent anyone insinuating these things aren't news worthy just because they hate President Bush so much that they also hate anything which casts his enemies in a revealing light.

"Deny Ignorance" my arse, the ignorance flies around this place like a swarm of locusts and whenever someone like Muaddib tries to inject a little reality and sensibility into things, their efforts are only trivialized.

Some of the people on ATS are so politically motivated with hatred for Bush that they'll willingly feign absolute blindness to the atrocities of his enemies. I find that revolting to the point of mentally regurgitating it.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags