It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Deutsche Bank building burns and does not collapse.

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 18 2007 @ 09:54 PM
link   
Many of you know me as the guy who doesn't think 9/11 was government done, but I must admit this seems intresting:

The good old Deutsche Bank building you all remember from this photo:

Is in fact burning and has killed 2 fire fighters:
abclocal.go.com...





The thing is this is just a sub structure slowly being dissolved away by de construction. Look up it if there is anything intresting on it. I'm not too into it, but I know you guys would like to look at it.
see ya.


[edit on 18-8-2007 by Gorman91]




posted on Aug, 18 2007 @ 10:11 PM
link   
It burned about 4 hrs according to CNN. 2 firefighters died and a couple injured and well..

Not much else to say.. It was being demolished so...



posted on Aug, 18 2007 @ 10:40 PM
link   
and your point is? because this didn't collapse, 911 must have been an inside job? Thats what the title of the post alludes to, and its a ludicrous comparison



posted on Aug, 18 2007 @ 10:45 PM
link   
Maybe you should research people before you accuse..

He is on your side.. Not mine.



posted on Aug, 18 2007 @ 11:11 PM
link   
Sad that these friefighters lost their lives.
Im not about to dive into comparisons to 9/11 or a lack there of.
Just a simple R.I.P to those heros who lost their lives fighting the fire.



posted on Aug, 19 2007 @ 01:03 AM
link   
Don't shoot the messenger, I just saw it on TV and thought you guys could use it or something. I'm just being the mail man.



posted on Aug, 19 2007 @ 01:28 AM
link   
reply to post by Gorman91
 


just pointing out your wording of the title, It's hard not to see what your getting at.. I mean if this was simply an RIP for the brave firefighters, then why post in the 9/11 forum, and especially why refer to it "not collapsing" ?



posted on Aug, 19 2007 @ 01:53 AM
link   
Just being a messenger.



posted on Aug, 19 2007 @ 12:21 PM
link   
Similar to Meridan Plaza fire in Philadelphia (1990) - 3 FF killed there
when became disoriented in smoke. For tinfoilers who are screaming that
building didn't collapse from fire -

Building was empty, there were no furnishings or tons and tons of
paper to fuel fire. More office furnishings are now made of plastics
such as chairs, cubicle dividers, desks are wood chip/sawdust held
together by plastic resins, carpets. Computers/printers/monitors
are mostly plastics. They burn hotter than ordinary materials

Fire was fueled by wood for staffoldings

Fire was well vented (no windows/partitions) so heat could escape

There were no standdpipes/sprinklers in operation which required FF
to haul up lenghts of hose to pipe water up to where fire was.
3 months ago piece of sprinkler pipe broke lose and crashed into nearby
firehouse.

At Meridian Plaza restrictor valves in standpipes cut water flow
and forced FF to haul lenghts of 5" hose up stairways to provide more
water

Once realize men were missing all operations were shifted to search and
rescue and available manpower would be used for rescue. This
impacted fire fighting.


cms.firehouse.com...



posted on Aug, 20 2007 @ 04:02 AM
link   
Yes, you are right.it didnt collapse.
the official version is a joke.

it was an inside job. the incredibility of this ´job´ has a tactical reason.
´they wont do that to us´..

thumbs up for the truth for 911.
think of the dead.

dont forget all the ´cia-friendly´ posters here.



posted on Aug, 20 2007 @ 10:45 AM
link   
So, we have a damaged building from 9/11, it catches fire and doesn't collapse but we can't compare it to WTC7? Interesting. When CAN we compare buildings to WTC 7? Does it have to be the exact same thing?

BTW, that fire looked more intense than any picture I've seen of WTC7 on 9/11. And that's not saying much.



posted on Aug, 20 2007 @ 11:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by Griff
BTW, that fire looked more intense than any picture I've seen of WTC7 on 9/11. And that's not saying much.



I have to agree with you on this one.. Those fires did look intense at Bankers Trust..

Interesting tho... This is a perfect example of WTC 7 if I ever seen it.. Prove us that it isn't... You know..

You guys compare everything under the sun to WTC 1 2 and 7.. You know like a Freeway overpass, A bridge, and A strip mall.

We actually use real buildings in our ideas, you guys just pull crap out of your butts.....




top topics



 
1

log in

join