It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
Check out the videos on Google:
Two ships powering up
UFOs in the sky
Another UFO
Close-up of Red Orb in the sky
[edit on 19-8-2007 by MrdDstrbr]
Originally posted by Michael Knight
Can I prove this?
Probably not to your satisfaction.
But I do not feel any need to prove anything that I have experienced, seen with my own eyes, and therefore know to be a personal truth.
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
Also, I noticed that the chief dismisser, torsion, hasn't said anything about the video footage Gilliland shows towards the end of the conference (also available on Google Vid) of orbs up in the sky "powering up" and then dematerializing....
Why is that, torsion? Did you even bother to WATCH the whole conference, or the UFO footage on Google? Or did you think it sufficient to just try to debunk a few photos and be done?
Originally posted by priloco
I dont know of any planes that change colors while pulsing and have the kind of intensity these objects have and in one of the videos they show a plane and it looks completely different and is much smaller with the flashing red light on the bottom.
Originally posted by SonicInfinity
You have to try and understand the perspective of the other side before you act. For all we know, the aliens might have been commanded by their leader not to make direct contact with us or, as somebody else previously said, the energy field around the ship may be harmful or deadly to us.
Originally posted by Michael Knight
But I have taken dozens of orb pics on my own digital camera - and having been a lifelong photo-journalist, I know the difference between dust and reflections of various sorts.
If it's legit, I can post alink here to a page on my web site where yopu can see two pics I took ten seconds apart. Same people in each shot. But one has an overlay of orbs, and the other is a perfectly clear background.
[edit on 20-8-2007 by Michael Knight]
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Areal51
Anyway, he basically came clean about why he made fun of the whole thing by dressing up as an Alien during a press conference addressing the Phoenix Lights.
No, he did not dress up. It was another official, I think his Chief of Staff. He said he did that to lessen the tension. He felt at the time that people were getting much too worked up about it. When interviewed he said in hindsight he thought that might have been a mistake and he wasn't sure he would make the same decision had he to do it over again. He then went on to say how he had seen the lights. He was interviewed very thoroughly in the movie, Out of the Blue.
Originally posted by torsion
They look like aircraft to me. I live close to an airport and you get the same effect when distant planes are approaching the flight path. A dim light that suddenly flares up - it's just the lights aligning with the observers eyes, nothing extraterrrestrial at all.
Why is that, torsion? Did you even bother to WATCH the whole conference, or the UFO footage on Google? Or did you think it sufficient to just try to debunk a few photos and be done?
I really didn't want to waste my time after seeing the bogus stuff he presented in his galleries. But I might just take the time to do it to please you, Mill
In return, what are your thoughts on the blu-tack ufo stuck to a pane of glass? I'd like to hear your defence of that.
Also your thoughts on the rotor kite being flown in London. Why would Gilliland try to pretend it's a ufo when you can see the old guy actually reeling it in? Further, why would you trust a person who presents this clearly fake evidence? Your comment, please Millerman.
The notion that the digital camera can pick up frequencies that the human eye cannot see is a device used by the naive or by the charlatan to deceive the unwary. Spiritualists pretend they are ghosts, contactees pretend they are extraterrestrial craft.
In a nutshell Gilliland's website has much evidence of deception and zero evidence of et contact.
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
Originally posted by Michael Knight
Yes please do! That would be an excellent way to demonstrate that the Orbs aren't "dust".
FYI - It was not raining and there was no dust around when I took
these pics
One of the most fascinating lectures at James' ECETI conference this year was by Dr Miceal Ledwith. He has over 100,000 orb pics, and a book on the subject will be coming out in October...complete with an in-depth explanation of the physics involved.
[edit on 20-8-2007 by Michael Knight]
[edit on 20-8-2007 by Michael Knight]
[edit on 20-8-2007 by Michael Knight]
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
And what did you make of this one, where he zooms in on a blue/pink Orb that is VERY obviously NOT an aircraft, that hovers, changes colors and pulsates, AND dematerializes?
Originally posted by torsion
Originally posted by MrdDstrbr
And what did you make of this one, where he zooms in on a blue/pink Orb that is VERY obviously NOT an aircraft, that hovers, changes colors and pulsates, AND dematerializes?
You're right, it's not a plane. It's Venus or some other bright star. It isn't hovering, nor is it moving - only the camera moves. The colour may not be natural but a ccd effect. The 'dematerialisation' is caused by a thin cloud, not visible at such a zoom, that gradually obscures the star.
Sorry, still no evidence of extraterrestrials. Think outside the confines of the Greerian box, Mill, and do some personal experimentation!
Originally posted by Michael Knight
Y'know - on the subject of orb pics - it would be so easy for anyone to use their own camera, take a lot of shots under different conditions, and see for themselves what they get.
Dr Ledwith (who happens to have five PhDs) has consecutive pictures of a dimensional torsion field forming - a time/space 'hole' - or doorway perhaps.