Canada's Big Box pot factory!, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 15-1-2004 @ 04:30 PM by Taxman
Originally posted by baked
Originally posted by Taxman
They should be sent to prison for life, remanded bail. No drugs, even pot should be allowed. They all kill just like smoking or drinking. Which if you cannot stop beer, its been tryed. You can ban smoking though by taxing the hell out of it.


Really?
Tell that to all the cancer and aids patients that have to go to these people because brainwashed people like you stay ignorant and mis-informed by choice.

Beer?
Beer can be stopped! Easier than Pot.
Pop a seed in the ground and grow a plant!
You know how to grow beer?
Hint: Ya got to brew it.

Explain exactly how, you can stop smoking by taxing it?
this makes no sence what so ever.
You will never be able to stop pot so ya might as well stop trying!
Believe what you want tho, everything kills you man, Pot just makes it hurt less.


Ok this is how...

Over tax it (tobacco) so it becomes unaffordable.

Your theory to end beer was tryed in the 20's if you havent heard. More people were drunk then anytime else in the US ever.

Saying that pot makes it hurt less is stupid. ITS KILLING YOURSELF by the same way pot does. It isnt the problem of it kills you, its the problem of people getting high, with judgement impared, hurting someone or worse.

I never said anything against medical, sanctioned pot (and sorry that I wasnt clear on that), I'd rather it as a last choice, however its ok by me as long as its controled. And In most states in the US, medical pot is allowed and I think in most countries too.

Becides, drug money supports crime (ie murder, narcotics, vandelism, terrorism, ect). And those who say it doesnt support terror, AL Queda's biggest money maker is heorin and pot.


reply posted on 15-1-2004 @ 04:42 PM by insite
Originally posted by Taxman
I never said anything against medical, sanctioned pot (and sorry that I wasnt clear on that), I'd rather it as a last choice, however its ok by me as long as its controled. And In most states in the US, medical pot is allowed and I think in most countries too.

Becides, drug money supports crime (ie murder, narcotics, vandelism, terrorism, ect). And those who say it doesnt support terror, AL Queda's biggest money maker is heorin and pot.


Firstly, only a handful of states endorse medical marijuana: Hawaii, Maine, Alaska, California, Colorado, Nevada, Washington and Oregon. Even less countries support its medical benefits and the United States Federal government is extremely anti-pot.

Secondly, like you just said, prohibition does not work. More people were drunk during prohibition than any other time. So if we legalized weed wouldn't that mean that less people would be getting high? you just said it yourself. I'm pointing out the correlation you refuse to admit to.

Thirdly, like I just said, the United States has the highest level of domestic cannabis production in the world. To say that a simple 1/8th purchase funds terrorism is an outrage seeing as though it probably came from some guy across town who wants nothing more than to be left alone and has no intention whatsoever of hurting others. Lumping Marijuana in with hard drugs is a big mistake on your part. Just because the DEA classifies it as Schedule I doesn't mean jack s**t, search the internet for studies on its beneficial uses and you will be inundated. You are living in the past Taxman, time to open your eyes.

By the way, the US "controlled" Afghanistan has seen opium poppy production increase to astronomical levels. Explain that.


reply posted on 15-1-2004 @ 05:19 PM by junglejake
Taxman, it sounds like you haven't ever done pot. It really doesn't inspire the rage in people that drinking does. It inspires more of a peaceful, lethargic, joyus, laughing, paranoid state.

As for causing more accidents, I highly doubt that. Right now, many of my friends drink ONLY when they can't get their hands on pot. And when they drink, they tend to drive. When they smoke pot, they just order a pizza and watch a movie or something.

As for pot being the gateway drug, my theory is this. Pot is a gateway drug because health classes deamonize it. "If you smoke pot, your nuts will fall off..." etc. At least this was the case about 7 years ago when I was getting the anti-drug rhetoric. And I bought into it hook line and sinker...Until a friend tricked me into trying pot. It was a great time, I didn't see spiders all over my skin, causing me to rip it off. I didn't go into this psychotic frenzy. And it got me thinking...What else was the health class lying about?

Personally, now, I don't smoke pot, but I do drink and smoke (that one is a PAIN to quit, no matter how expensive it gets!). However, many of my friends have gone down a path to oblivion because of the mentality of what I just stated. Well, if pot was ok, what about coke? Well, coke seems alright, let's try acid. And usually, in my experience, after people take that step, there's very little that they won't try. I have one friend who drinks a bottle of robitussin and goes preaching to trees.

The solution? If pot is legalized, no longer would it be the gateway drug. It would no longer be the first illegal drug someone takes and thinks the government is just trying to keep them from being happy. If they never cross that legality line, they will be less inclined to do so in the future...


reply posted on 15-1-2004 @ 05:20 PM by insite
Originally posted by Taxman
However legalization of beer and legalization of pot are different. Allowing pot to be sold legaly will cause a immedate, extreme, increase of accidents caused by getting high and will open up the flood gates. People once they get board of pot as often many adects do quickly it will lead to experimentation of the more lethal ones. Which then the'll find some bull# (not saying all the study on pot is) study that will end up to the legalization of the next drug and so on and so fourth. I am not saying that medical pot is lethal, its about as lethal as tobacco, which should be outlawed in public because of health risks to other people (privatly would be ok).


It has been proven time and time again that pot is not a gateway drug. I have many friends who will testify to this. The reason it seems like it does lead to hard drugs is because people who are willing to experiment with an illegal drug like pot are also willing to experiment with others. I myself am a walking testimony to the fact that pot is not addictive having quit cold turkey and to this day I feel fine.

To say that pot is just as lethal as tobacco? Well I would like to see you back this up. Im not hiding behind the fact that many smokers of pot also smoke cigarettes and get cancer. Answer this question for me: Why, if people who smoke both cigarettes and weed get caner, do doctors blame it on the cigarettes? Because pot has been proven to shrink tumors, there's proof right here on ATS. Also, THC is a cannabinoid for which your brain was born with receptors for, thus you can never OD.

Driving under the influence of marijuana is far safer than under any other form of intoxication, ask any smoker. Hightened sense of alertness and paranoia of getting caught are reasons for a better driving experience with someone under the influence of weed. Road rage is non existent. Because marijuana is a drug, there is also the ability for the user to develop a tolerance. And within a matter of days of smoking constantly a smoker reaches 1000% Fat cell THC concentration. The commercial on TV here says that 1/3 of all reckless drivers tested positive for marijuana. What about the other 2/3? Marijuana cannot be linked to traffic problems unless you have a watered down chinese whisper story to tell.

Man, I could go on forever, the truth is that the government does not care about health issues. Thats not why weed is illegal. Its because law enforcement makes a huge amount of money on it (Over 650,000 people arrested last year for possession = lawyers and fines to pay), the DEA is even part of the Treasury department under the executive branch (what the hell?). Pharamceutical companies would lose a huge chunk of their revenue to something you could grow in your closet and I'm sure Bayer would go out of business.

Don't believe everything you read/see. Do some research and form your OWN opinions, not the ones spoon-fed to you by professional propaganda artists, who, might I add, wouldn't have a job if it wasn't for the drug war.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Alaska: Samantha Koenig Kidnapped last week.
  Posted 3 days ago with 111 member flags
Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 16 days ago with 81 member flags
The Chinese have seen the dragon in the sky !!
  Posted 3 days ago with 69 member flags
Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 12 days ago with 60 member flags
She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags
Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 13 days ago with 42 member flags
Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 8 days ago with 33 member flags