I apologize in advance if this is in the wrong topic.
We have all heard of the plan by global elites to reduce to population to a manageable 500 million people, but my question is this:
With the coming overpopulation disaster awaiting the entire planet, why are people against reducing the population globally?
The U.S. is projected to hit 400 million people by the year 2050 (a 100 million person increase in under 50 years) and all one must do is take a look
at society around them to see that we simply cannot absorb that many new people. Our standard of living would be substantially degraded, and our
infrastructure would crumble.
The U.S. could maintain a relatively stable population if all immigration (legal and illegal) were to cease immediately. It would all but guarantee a
better standard of living for our children and their children, as opposed to being crushed by a human flood.
Surely what I am about to say will bring cries of racism as it has on other forums, let me assure you this has nothing to do with race.
The largest problem with overpopulation rests in the 3rd world nations, those nations who really dont contribute much to the planet while sucking away
vital resources. Various factors including lack of education and religion lead to virtually no birth control methods being used, which results in even
more suffering for the masses.
These 3rd world people eventually attempt to migrate to modernized nations which results in higher social service costs, higher taxes, and a lower of
standard of living for those who have lived and grown in the modernized countries.
Case in point: Certain areas of the U.S. resemble 3rd world nations themselves due to a large influx of said 3rd world immigrants. Given that a
majority of those who migrate to the U.S. come from poverty stricken nations, how many more will be able to be absorbed before the general standard of
living in the U.S. declines more than it already has?
Disclaimer: I am not comparing humans to animals, simply using the analogy of why certain events must take place. I am NOT advocating the hunting of
We all know why hunting of wildlife is necessary: The herd must be culled in order to preserve the ecosystem. Using deer as an example (something I am
familiar with growing up in northern WI), an overpopulation of deer will completely destroy the local ecosystem, thereby creating even more deaths
from starvation and other causes. If proper management is practiced, a certain number of deer will be taken by hunters in order to preserve and
guarantee the future of a healthy deer population.
Sometimes unpleasant events are necessary in order to maintain the greater good. People who tend to think more with emotion than logic will have a
hard time understanding the problems that lie in wait for us. Something must be done, and the longer we wait, the worse it will be.
Thanks for taking the time to read my lengthy rambling.