posted on Aug, 17 2007 @ 06:26 AM
Interesting article here:
Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) Summit of the leaders of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico scheduled to be held this August 20 and 21.
The first question is: Why the secrecy over a summit of supposedly democratic leaders?
"If you sometime watch television, with particular reference to cable televisions stations like the Discovery Channel, you might have seen various
representations by UFO investigators and members of the public about places like Area 51, and other places of alleged Human and Extraterrestrial
contact. UFO investigators who are part of the Exopolitics community, have also disturbingly alleged various human elites have entered into legal
Agreements to gain access advanced Extraterrestrial technologies for money-making commercial and military use, in exchange for basically selling-out
the rest of humanity in their Agreements. Consider a Manipulative Extraterrestrial that is approaching a greed driven elite which is addicted to
commercial gain and military dominance like a crack coc aine addict that wants to keep pursuing that elusive "high" by operating toward this
Earthbound elite within the following proposition: We will give you access to technology over 1000 years more advanced than your current technology,
for your commercial and military use, in exchange for a "friendly alliance" of "equals" with us."
Try and read the whole thing in the article, do you think there is some sort of agenda for this meeting or are we stretching our minds a bit too far
here?, I can't form an opinion because I will need to research background stuff as i'm from the UK.
Through the SPP the sitting heads of state of the United States and Mexico, along with the Prime Minister of Canada (a federal constitutional
monarchy) seek to establish a cooperative approach to advance in common security and prosperity, promote economic growth, competitiveness, and quality
of life, develop a common security strategy to further secure North America, focusing on securing North America from external threats, preventing and
responding to internal threats within North America, and streamlining the secure and efficient movement of legitimate and low-risk traffic across
I would have brushed passed this article if it wasn't for the 25 KM presence, is this the norm for such meetings?
[edit on 17/8/07 by October]