This topic is in the Breaking Alternative News discussion forum.  (rss)


Pentagon Pays $998,798 for sending two 19-cent washers to Texas


<<  2    3    4    5  >>



reply posted on 19-8-2007 @ 01:35 PM by arloray



Originally posted by RCarter
I wonder if they were the low bidder?


They didn't need to be low bidder. They were "female."

That trumps "low bid."




reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-8-2007 @ 04:23 AM by WraothAscendant


I need to get a government contract for washers!!!!!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-8-2007 @ 11:18 AM by Paul_Richard



Originally posted by Luap
I'll check it all out. If, as you say, accurate sources are difficult to come by due to the nature of the subject, then how do you know any of this stuff is real?

You cross-reference and analyze and you come to know that some sources are more accurate than others. This comes with experience.

In ATS, John Lear is considered to be an expert on this and related subjects.


Originally posted by johnlear

The question is what are they (NASA) trying to hide?

The exploration of space, the mining of the moon, the mining of Mars, and the existence of human life on the Moon, Venus, Mars and ever other planet in the solar system. The exploration started in the early 1960's with anti-grav propulsion that had been perfected by then. We have large bases both on the moon and Mars and have done some incredibly interesting stuff. Its a secret and that is what they are trying to hide.

Source

Henceforth, I direct your inquiries on this matter to him.




reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-8-2007 @ 12:29 PM by Luap


reply to post by Paul_Richard



Another question: what would be the purpose of keeping the public in the dark about an extraterrestrial threat? Also, if these guys know so much, why haven't they just disappeared?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-8-2007 @ 01:14 PM by Paul_Richard


reply to post by Luap


Again...I refer you to John Lear.

[edit on 21-8-2007 by Paul_Richard]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-8-2007 @ 03:26 PM by SkipShipman


Of course they were probably turned in by other contractors they were undercutting. Now I am probably only half joking, but gimme a break already, no-bid contracts mean exactly what they say. Now while they focus on this instance, are they going to lift one finger to find the missing $3-4 trillion missing in the mix of accounting? It looks like the Britney Spears and Anna Nicole Smith of the Defense Department and their version of distractions to me.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  2    3    4    5  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:


























ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.074 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread
Forums Directory