posted on Oct, 13 2007 @ 03:45 AM
Was the World Trade Center "wired" to implode?
Until recently I would have thought the idea was insane, absurd even.
But I have since come to the conclusion that either those buildings were professionally prepared to be "brought down" in an emergency; or
everyone who witnessed the collapse of the WTC towers that awful day witnessed an occurance of a statistical impropability so extreme, that it
plausibly serves as quantifiable proof of the existence of a benevelent Diety.
At any given moment, it is entirely within the realm of statistical probability that either one of the twin towers could have collapsed as the
result of the type and extent of the damage inflicted by a jumbo jet impact.
Remember, when the towers were designed, airplanes the size of those that were used that day as "guided-missles", didn't even exist as rough plans
on the drawing board. And although the WTC architects considered the possibility of an aircraft strike in their designs; the planes they designed
against were considerably smaller than what actually hit on 9/11.
The damage resulting from an impact far exceding even the worst-case scenarios could easily have resulted a complete structural collapse.
And, although it would stretch the limits of probability, it is statisticaly possible that such a collapse might have been contained
entirely within the general footprint of the tower.
Once in a life-time, perhaps.
But what we saw on 9/11, was the total collapse of Both towers, after having suffered what on the surface might appear to have been
similar impacts, but which in fact, due to the multitude of "real-world" variables inherent in any two or more separate real world
occurances, were in no way similar to any servicable degree.
Now exceeding the realm of rational probability, having suffered extensive, but, by the very nature of the method employed, dis-similar damage, both
towers not only collapse, but the collapse of each tower
is "miraculously" contained within each buildings' general footprint!
And, as if this is not enough to completely boggle the mind, these miraculous collapses occur not over eons, or even decades,
But within mere minutes of each other!
I beg some one with an adept education in statistics/probability to calculate the odds of such an occurance.
So yes, I, too, now believe that the WTC was wired to "self-destruct" in an effort to minimize the potential devastation of an "uncontrolled"
I think that the undertaking was the direct result of the 1993 attack on the towers. I am certain that the contingency was at least vetted by federal
officials, perhaps without the knowledge of state, city, or emergency personnel. In fact, I doubt that even the building's owner would have been
privy to the plan.
It is even possible that the installing technicians were not aware of what they were actually doing; they need only be given the neccessary materials
(perhaps disguised to look like optic cable) and a plans for the proper installation.
Absolute secrecy would be required: who would knowingly work, on a daily basis, in a building wired to implode on command? How could a building's
owner ever manage to insure such a structure? What of the gov't's liability regarding those victims unable to escape before the order to demo was
given? The litigation could easily topple a sitting administration.
MY biggest question, however is this:
What Other structures might also be "prepped" for "surgical, controlled implosion" should the "need" arise?
Is Your office "wired"?