It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FredT
One quick question and forgive me if its been asked before:
As part of this physics defying feat, was the building hit by a 200000 lb+ object travaling at 400-500 mph? and full of jet fuel?
[edit on 8/16/07 by FredT]
Originally posted by FredT
As part of this physics defying feat, was the building hit by a 200000 lb+ object travaling at 400-500 mph? and full of jet fuel?
Originally posted by carewemust
The eye-opening
part of this story though is that in China the police beat the living crap
out of people for taking photos of buildings under construction! Geezz.
Well all I can say is God Bless America and Democracy.
-cwm
Originally posted by FredT
However we have been down this road before eh?
"Dead Horses to the left, stick to the right" Help yourself
Originally posted by Griff
Just wait till the photography ban in NYC takes affect. Gotta love Democracy.
Originally posted by carewemust
Ah..interesting! Where can I find information on this? I don't know
how to do a productive web search without turning up thousands of
un-related hits.
Originally posted by bsbray11
That's all the planes did, right? Sever some columns? And we even know about how many in each tower, down to a small margin of error. What else is the problem? Am I missing anything else about the planes?
Originally posted by FredT
I have the luck that two members of my family are Civil engineers. My dad and my unlce both agree that the given the scneario, both are surprised the building stood up as long as it did.
Originally posted by Marlborough Red
Whats also funny is I don't recall a Jumbo Jet hitting towers 1&2 either......!
Originally posted by FredT
Here is the thing. Im not saying the impact of the a/c alone caused the failure. Perhaps the fire alone may not have caused the failure of the towers. But the two events?
Originally posted by Griff
My only agenda is to educate some people. It hasn't worked so far.
Originally posted by ThichHeaded
Wait it was hit with a plane... thats been said.. Have a Nice day.
[edit on 8/16/2007 by ThichHeaded]
Originally posted by thedman
What I see is:
building under construction = empty building = no fire load
fire load is the amount of combustibles per sq unit ( lbs/sq ft, kg/sq m)
also what type of materials are in building? Wood, steel, concrete
Are the furnishings synthetic (plastic) which burns with 50-100% more
heat per unit.
How much materials are present? Also WTC being office building were
loaded with thousands of tons of paper and such which fueled fires.
I've seen a fire in an empty building started by welding torch, under
renovation worker set fire inside wall, bitch and half to fight, lots of
smoke, little fire. I take it something similar happened in China
Fred T
Originally posted by thedman
What I see is:
building under construction = empty building = no fire load
fire load is the amount of combustibles per sq unit ( lbs/sq ft, kg/sq m)
also what type of materials are in building? Wood, steel, concrete
Are the furnishings synthetic (plastic) which burns with 50-100% more
heat per unit.
How much materials are present? Also WTC being office building were
loaded with thousands of tons of paper and such which fueled fires.
I've seen a fire in an empty building started by welding torch, under
renovation worker set fire inside wall, bitch and half to fight, lots of
smoke, little fire. I take it something similar happened in China