For me a video will never be enough for proof positive of anything.
Reports from multiple sources of the same event by different means is going some way there. Take the recent phone camera footage of that Chinese jet
burning in Okinawa. If it were just that footage, it could have just been a lark. But multiple news sources and multiple witnesses say it was so. Now
even then the paranoid element of my psyche has not washed out the rather huge and ridiculous possibility that the whole world media was in on the
gig, paid off by large corporations but I doubt it!!!
As has been said by other posts in this thread multiple sightings by multiple witnesses from all angles, with multiple video / camera footage.
hopefully with narrative. Amongst that footage I would need close ups of the craft...no dots on the horizon, no seagulls, no "Technically it is a UFO
because we can't identify what kind of bird it is!" and absolutely no CGI artefacts!! That’s getting closer to me accepting that this stuff is
more than delusion or belief over-expectation. People are gullible, go to the Paranormal Forum. people there really believe Chris Angel levitates by
the power of Chi-kinesis
I want to know, not believe, as someone once said and I get fed up of flocks of birds as UFO fleets and CGI UFO's. Everytime a new pic / vid gets
posted here I think "Here we go again!!" Something else that also gets my goat is the way the "believers" immediately round on someone who says it
is a CGI / Photoshop. Don't jump on the sceptics, jump on the hoaxers who make them sceptics!!!
Going by the rate of fakes at the moment, the believers should be thankful that the expert sceptics are getting it right. If it were not for the
debunking going on here we would be expecting non human craft, of various designs to be appearing outside every window!! Humans do lie, they do hoax
and hide away from the real world, keeping our identities secret...how many here use their real names in the forums? Hoaxing will always be part of
life, as much as paranoia and wishful thinking is.
Personally, I say thank you to the debunkers. They are keeping it real. So for me, loads of lovely footage from loads of lovely witnesses, with loads
of data...time, date well basically a checklist like Leibolmai
One more thing that gets me, is that people only seem to look for the visual clues. That Haiti jobby got me thinking with the narrative. You the
autolevel of the camcorders microphone appeared to be right up....you could hear people in the street some distance away. But all you got from the
alleged "videographer" was a sigh / gasp, that has been shown to be an available sound file. How many people here would be struck dumb...however
awesome the sight was? I have put myself in the position of the hoaxer and my narrative would be nearer....."Fuggin 'ell, sheet, sheet its
real...I've got some news!!!" Not a sad embarrassing post orgasmic sigh......well actually you might get the sigh as well!!