posted on Aug, 14 2007 @ 08:13 AM
Well, I think it's an interesting idea. Thinking outside the box!
"And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto me from the ground. And now art thou cursed from the earth,
which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother's blood from thy hand; When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her
strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth." (Gen. 4:10-12.)
The Bible of course doesn’t really say much about the curse of Cain or the mark for that matter. Most people believe that the curse would be
something like an inability to cultivate crops. At some stage people even saw the "mark" as a black skin - which is of course a bit racist...
Anyway - there are already so many different theories about the mark, and no two scholars can fully agree on a fact. Thus adding another one seem to
make it even more complicated... And just as difficult to prove.
Personally this theory would be less likely as an animal form as a "mark" doesn't really make sense; it is said that all people would recognize the
mark. Secondly how would "Cain" (Bigfoot) end up in the U.S.? We also have to keep in mind that Bigfoot is by no means an American phenomenon. Nor
is he limited to the popular U.S. form. Take the white Yeti for example. Then there are several sightings of a "mother and baby" or even more than
one Bigfoot at a time...
Well, interesting theory nonetheless.